Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-xtvcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-20T14:30:23.296Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Melted Synthetic Zirconolite-Based Matrices: Effect of Cooling Rate and Heat Treatment on Ceramic Microstructure and Chemical Durability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

T. Advocat ,
P.J. McGlinn ,
C Fillet ,
G. Leturcq ,
S. Schuller ,
A. Bonnetier  and
K. Hart
T. Advocat
Affiliation:
CEA/SCD-Marcoule, BP 171 30207 Bagnols-sur-Cèze Cedex, France
P.J. McGlinn
Affiliation:
ANSTO, New Illawarra Road, Menai PMB1, NSW2234, Australia
C Fillet
Affiliation:
CEA/SCD-Marcoule, BP 171 30207 Bagnols-sur-Cèze Cedex, France
G. Leturcq
Affiliation:
ANSTO, New Illawarra Road, Menai PMB1, NSW2234, Australia
S. Schuller
Affiliation:
CEA/SCD-Marcoule, BP 171 30207 Bagnols-sur-Cèze Cedex, France
A. Bonnetier
Affiliation:
CEA/SCD-Marcoule, BP 171 30207 Bagnols-sur-Cèze Cedex, France
K. Hart
Affiliation:
ANSTO, New Illawarra Road, Menai PMB1, NSW2234, Australia
Get access

Abstract

The heat treatment conditions are a key factor in fabricating zirconolite ceramics and glass-ceramics following high-temperature melting. An oxide mixture melted at 1450°C and subsequently heat-treated at 1200°C yielded a glass-ceramic containing crystallized zirconolite–2M. The silica-enriched residual glass represented about 60-70 vol% of the total; the actinide surrogates (Nd, Ce)were equally distributed between the residual glass and the zirconolite crystals. Zirconolite ceramics obtained after melting an oxide mixture at 1600–1700°C consisted of zirconolite, perovskite and rutile. Rapid cooling rates (> 100°#x00B0;··min-1) were obtained by pouring the melt into ingot molds; the resulting zirconolite ceramics were characterized by crystals of zirconolite-2M ranging from 1 to no more than 20 μm. Slow cooling (< 25°C#x00B0;··min-1 produced ceramics with crystals several hundred micrometers long. Despite the microstructural differences, the chemical durability of the zirconolite ceramics was identical. The initial alteration rates r0 were about two orders of magnitude lower than those measured for the residual aluminosilicate glass of the zirconolite glass-ceramics. Moreover, during long-term leach tests at high S/V ratios to obtain advanced degrees of reaction progress, the alteration rates of all the materials diminished by over 3 to 4 orders of magnitude below r0.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 663: Symposium – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste management XXIV , 2000 , 277
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Vance, E.R., Begg, B.D., Day, R.A. and Ball, C.J., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management, Mat. Res. Symp. Proc., vol. 353 (1995).Google Scholar
2. Ringwood, A.E. et al., in Radioactive Wasteforms for the Future, Lutze, W. and Ewing, R.C. (Editors), NorthHolland (1988).Google Scholar
3. Ebbinghaus, B., Vkonynenburg, R., Vance, E. and Allender, J., In Waste Management proc. USA, (1998).Google Scholar
4. McGlinn, P., Hart, K.P., Loi, E.H. and Vance, E.R., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XVIII, Mat. Res. Symp. Proc. vol. 353, 847–852, (1995), Murakami, T. and Ewing, R. C. Editors.Google Scholar
5. Hart, K., Mitamura, H., Vance, E., Lumpkins, G., Matsumoto, S. and , T. Banba., in 2nd NUCEF'98.Google Scholar
6. Vance, E.R., Ball, C.J., Blackford, M.G., Cassidy, D.J. and Smith, K.L.. J. Nucl. Mater., 175 (1990) 58.Google Scholar
7. Fillet, C., Marillet, J., Dussossoy, J.L. and Phalippou, J.,In Acers Fall Meeting proceedings 1997, Cincinatti, Am. Ceram. Society Proceedings (1997).Google Scholar
8. Advocat, T., Fillet, C., Marillet, J., Leturcq, G., Boubals, J.M. and , Bonnetier, in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXI, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. vol. 506, (1998).Google Scholar
9. Loiseau, P., Caurant, F. and Fillet, C., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management, Mater. Res. Soc.Symp. Proc. (This volume).Google Scholar
10. Berger, G., Claparols, C, Daux, V. and Guy, C., in Geochim. Cosmochim. Act 58, 4875–4886 (1994).Google Scholar
11. Leturcq, G., Berger, G., Advocat, T. and Vernaz, E., Chemical Geology 160, 39–62 (1999).Google Scholar
12. Delage, F. and Dussossoy, J.L., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIV, Mater. Res. Soc.Symp. Proc. vol. 212, (1991).Google Scholar
13. Techer, I., Ph.D. Thesis, CEA-published Scientific Report °, ISSN 7° (2000).Google Scholar
14. Sobolev, I.A., Stefanovsky, S.V. and Lifanov, F.A., in Radiochemistry (Russ.), 35, 99 (1993).Google Scholar
15. Advocat, T., Leturcq, G., Lacombe, J., Berger, G., Day, R.A. and Hart, K., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XX, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. vol. 465, 355–362 (1997).Google Scholar
16. Xu, H., , Wang, in (1999).Google Scholar
17. , G. Leturcq. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. P. Sabatier, Toulouse, 1998.Google Scholar
18. Leturcq, G. et al., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., This volume.(2000).Google Scholar
19. Lumpkin, G.R., Smith, K.L. and Blackford, M. G, J. Mater. Res., vol. 6 N°10, 2218–2233 (1991).Google Scholar