Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:24:26.311Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Melt Processed Electrically Conductive Binary and Ternary Immiscible Polymer / Polyaniline Blends

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

M. Zilberman
Affiliation:
Departments of Materials and Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel.
A. Siegmann
Affiliation:
Departments of Materials and Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel.
M. Narkis
Affiliation:
Chemical Engineering, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel
Get access

Abstract

In the present study, conductive binary and ternary blends of PANI with thermoplastic polymers were prepared by melt processing.

The binary blends' investigation focused on the morphology and on the resulting electrical conductivity. Generally, the level of interaction between the doped PANI and the matrix polymer determines the blend morphology, and thus, its electrical conductivity. The morphology of a conductive network is described by a primary structure of small dispersed polyaniline particles, interconnected by secondary short range fine fibrillar structure. In blends containing a semicrystalline matrix the doped PANI network locates within the amorphous regions, leading to a reduction of the percolation concentration.

The ternary blends' investigation focused on a system containing two co-continuous immiscible thermoplastic polymers and PANI. The PANI is preferably located in one of the matrix polymers. This concentration effect enables high electrical conductivities at low PANI contents.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Ikkala, O.T., Laakso, J., Vakiparta, K., Virtanen, E., Ruohnen, H., Jarvinen, H., Taka, T., Passiniemi, P. and Osterholm, J.E.., Synthetic metals, 69, 97 (1995).Google Scholar
2. Heeger, A.J., Synthetic metals, 57, 3471 (1993).Google Scholar
3. Cao, Y., Smith, P. and Heeger, A.J., Synthetic metals, 57, 3514 (1993).Google Scholar
4. Yang, C.Y., Cao, Y., Smith, P. and Heeger, A.J., Synthetic metals, 53, 293 (1993).Google Scholar
5. Shacklette, L.W., Han, C.C. and Luly, M.H., Synthetic metals, 57, 3532 (1993).Google Scholar
6. Davides, S.J., Ryan, T.G., Wilde, C.J. and Beyer, G., Synthetic metals, 69, 209 (1995).Google Scholar
7. Passiniemi, P., Laakso, J., Ruohnen, H. and Vakiparta, K., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., Vol.413, P.577 (1996).Google Scholar
8. Lee, Y.J., Manas-Zloczower, I. and Feke, D.L., Polym. Eng. Sci, 35, 1037 (1995).Google Scholar
9. Narkis, M., Zilberman, M. and Siegmann, A., Polym. Adv. Tech., 8, 525 (1997).Google Scholar
10. Zilberman, M., Siegmann, A. and Narkis, M., “Melt Processed Electrically Conductive Polymer / Polyaniline Blends”, Journal of Macromolecular Science - Physics (B), in press.Google Scholar