Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:28:36.295Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mechanisms of the Nonlinear Optical Response in Tetraras(Cumylphenoxy)Phthalocyanines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Steven R. Flom
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375.
James S. Shirk
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375.
J. R. Lindle
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375.
F. J. Bartoli
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375.
Zakya H. Kafafi
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375.
R. G. S. Pong
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375.
Arthur W. Snow
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375.
Get access

Abstract

The third order nonlinear optical (NLO) response of metal free tetrakis(cumylphenoxy)-phthalocyanine, (H2Pc(CP)4) was investigated at 597 nm, near resonance with the strong Q band. The second hyperpolarizability, γ, and the figure of merit, χ(3)/α, measured with a 1.2 ps pulse. was approximately independent of concentration between a 4.6×10−4 M solution and a neat thin film. The decay of the nonlinear response, however, depended substantially on the concentration and physical state of the material.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Shirk, J.S., Lindle, J.R., Bartoli, F.J., Kafafi, Z.H. and Snow, A.W.; in “New Materiab for Nonlinear Optics” ed. Marder, S.R., Sohn, J.E. and Stucky, G.D.; ACS Symposium Series 455, (1991); p626 Google Scholar
2. Shirk, J.S., Lindle, J.R., Bartoli, F.J., Hoffman, C.A., Kafafi, Z.H. and Snow, A.W., Appl. Phys. Lett 55, 1287(1989).Google Scholar
3. Prasad, P.N., Casstevens, M.K., Pfleger, J. and Logsdon, P., SPIE Proc. 878, 106 (1988).Google Scholar
4. Casstevens, M.K., Samoc, M., Pfleger, J. and Prasad, P.N., J. Chem. Phys., 92, 2019 (1990).Google Scholar
5. Greene, B.I. and Millard, R.R., Phys. Rev. Lett., 55, 1331 (1985).Google Scholar
6. Ho, Z.Z. and Peyghambarian, N., Chem. Phys. Lett., 148, 107 (1988).Google Scholar
7. Vincent, P.S., Voigt, E.M. and Reickhoff, K.E., J. Chem. Phys., 55, 4131 (1971).Google Scholar
8. Xuan, N.P., Ferrier, J., Gazengel, J. and Riviore, G., Opt. Commun., 51 (1984) 433.Google Scholar
9. Yariv, A., Quantum Electronics, Third Edition, (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1989); p490 Google Scholar
10. Schectman, B.H. and Spicer, W.E., J. Mol. Spec., 33, 28 (1970).Google Scholar