Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T22:36:28.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mechanical Stress Effects on Electromigration Voiding in a Meandering Test Stripe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Lynn E. Lowry ,
Beverly H. Tai ,
J. Mattila  and
LH. Walsh
Lynn E. Lowry
Affiliation:
Jet Propulsion Laboratory/California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109
Beverly H. Tai
Affiliation:
Jet Propulsion Laboratory/California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109
J. Mattila
Affiliation:
Rome Laboratory, Griffiss AFB, NY.
LH. Walsh
Affiliation:
Rome Laboratory, Griffiss AFB, NY.
Get access

Abstract

Earlier experimental findings concluded that electromigration voids in these meandering stripe test structures were not randomly distributed and that void nucleation frequently occurred sub-surface at the metal/thermal oxide interface. The data showed a strong correlation between void area, void growth rate and stripe segment length [1]. The influence of mechanical stress on electromigration damage in these test structures has been examined by applying tensile stresses to both passivated and unpassivated samples. The stress distributions are calculated using finite element analysis for each of the test conditions. The resulting impact on electromigration voiding, as well as mechanical stress voiding, and lateral hillock formation is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 308: Symposium M1 – Thin Films: Stresses and Mechanical Properties IV , 1993 , 273
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Mattila, J.B. and Levi, M.W., presented at the 1992 MRS Fall Meeting, Boston, MA, 1992 (unpublished).Google Scholar
2 Ross, C.A., Drewery, J.S., Somekh, R.E. and Evetts, J.E., J. Elec. Mater. 19, 911–918(1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 Lloyd, J.R. in Thin films: Stresses and Mechanical Properties III, edited by Nix, W.D., Bravman, J.C., Arzt, E. and Freund, L.B. (Mater. Res. See. Proc. 239, Pittsburgh, PA, 1992) pp. 667–676.Google Scholar
4 Arzt, E., Kraft, O., Sanchez, J., Bader, S. and Nix, W.D. in Thin films: Stresses and Mechanical Properties III. edited by Nix, W.D., Bravman, J.C., Arzt, E. and Freund, L.B. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 239, Pittsburgh, PA, 1992) pp. 677–682.Google Scholar
5 Korhonen, M.A., Borgesen, P. and Che-Yu, Li, MRS Bulletin, 61–68 (July 1992).Google Scholar
6 Rosenmayer, C.T., Brotzen, F.R., McPherson, J.W. and Dunn, C.F., IEEE/IRPS, 52–56 (1991).Google Scholar
7 Brotzen, F.R., Rosenmayer, C.T., Dunn, C.F. and McPherson, J.W. in Thin films: Stresses and Mechanical Properties III, edited by Nix, W.D., Bravman, J.C., Arzt, E. and Freund, L.B. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 239, Pittsburgh, PA, 1992) pp.689–694.Google Scholar
8 Flinn, P.A. and Chiang, C., J. Appl. Phys. 67, 2927–2931 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 LaCombe, D.J. and Parks, E.L., IEEE/IRPS, 1–6(1986).Google Scholar
10 Wilson, Edward L., Structural Analysis Program, Version P5.40, Copyright 1978–1992.Google Scholar