Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:36:36.192Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mechanical Property Improvements on Ion Implanted Diamond

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

N. E. W. Hartley*
Affiliation:
Building 329, Aere Harwell, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 Ora, UK
Get access

Abstract

A series of simple mechanical tests on single crystal diamond, diamond styli and diamond finishing tools has shown that frictional force, surface cracking and strength behaviour under simulated wear conditions can be improved as the result of N and Bion implantation at room temperature. Scratch tests on a polished macroscopic diamond of (111) planar orientation submitted to a total dose of 9.1015 N ions/cm2 revealed that a slight reduction in friction force occurred during dry sliding over the implanted region. Nitrogen implanted diamond gramophone styli held against a slowly rotating polished TiC disc under light load were found to significantly outlast unimplanted or carbon implanted samples, which generally failed abruptly on contact. In a third series of experiments, diamond tipped finishing tools used for high speed machining operationson acrylic plastic were implanted with N, B, and C ions to similar doses, all below 1016 per cm2. Nitrogen and boron implantations were found to improve the cutting life and quality of cut by as much as a factor 5, whereas carbon ions were much less effective.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Currently at Naval Research Laboratory, Code 6671, Washington, DC 20375, USA

References

REFERENCES

1.Hartley, N. E. W., Swindlehurst, W. E., Dearnaley, G., and Turner, J. F., J. Matls. Sci. 8, 900 (1973).Google Scholar
2.Hartley, N. E. W., Dearnaley, G., Turner, J. F., and Saunders, J., Applications of Ion Beams to Metals, Picraux, S. T., EerNisse, E. P., and Vook, F. L. eds. (Plenum, New York, 1974) pp. 125138.Google Scholar
3.Tabor, D., Chapter 10 in The Properties of Diamond, Field, J. E. ed. (Academic Press, London, 1979).Google Scholar
4.Chrenko, R. M., Tuft, R. E., and Strong, H. M., Nature 270, 141 (1977).Google Scholar
5.Evans, T., Contemp. Physics 17, 45 (1976).Google Scholar
6.Berman, R., Hudson, P. R. W., and Martinez, M., J. Phys. C. 8, L430 (1975).Google Scholar
7.Brosius, P. R., Corbett, J. W., and Bourgoin, J. C., Phys. Status Solidi A: 21, 677 (1974).Google Scholar
8.Hauser, J. J. and Patel, J. R., Solid State Commun. 18, 789 (1976).Google Scholar
9.Manning, I. and Mueller, G. P., Computer Phys. Communic. 7, 85 (1974).Google Scholar
10.Goode, P. D., Nucl. Instrum. and Methods 92, 447 (1971).Google Scholar
11.Marshall, D. G. and Lawn, B. R., J. Matls. Sci. 14, 2001 (1979).Google Scholar
12. UK Patent 1,588,418, publ. 23 April 1981.Google Scholar
13.Herbert, S., Indust. Diamond Rev., 407 (1977).Google Scholar
14.Wilks, E. M. and Wilks, J., Philos. Mag. 4, 158 (1959).Google Scholar
15.Seal, M., Indust. Diamond Rev. 25, 111 (1965).Google Scholar
16.Enomoto, Y. and Tabor, D., Proc. R. Soc. London A 373, 405 (1981).Google Scholar
17.Davies, G., Nature 292, 288 (1981).Google Scholar
18.Collins, A. T., J. Phys. C. 11, L417 (1978);Google Scholar
Collins, A. T., J. Phys. C. 13, 2641 (1980).Google Scholar
19.Allen, B. P. and Evans, T., Proc. R. Soc. London A 375, 93 (1981).Google Scholar
20.Roberts, S. G. and Page, T. F., in “Ion Implantation into Metals,” Eds., Ashworth, et al. (Pergamon, 1982).Google Scholar
21.Maby, E.W., Magee, C. W., Morewood, J. H., Appl. Phys. Lett. 39, 157 (1981).Google Scholar
22.Glardon, R. E. and Finnie, I., J. Matls. Sci. 16, 1776 (1981).Google Scholar
23.Crompton, D., Hirst, W., and Howse, M. G. W., Proc. R. Soc. London A 333, 435 (1973).Google Scholar