Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:40:45.603Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Mechanical Properties of A Ni-30Al-2OFe-0.05Zr Intermetallic Alloy in the Temperature Range 300–1200 K.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

S. V. Raj
Affiliation:
NASA Lewis Research Center, MS 49–1, Cleveland, OH 44135.
R. D. Noebe
Affiliation:
NASA Lewis Research Center, MS 49–1, Cleveland, OH 44135.
I. E. Locci
Affiliation:
NASA Lewis Research Center, MS 49–1, Cleveland, OH 44135.
Get access

Abstract

Tensile tests were conducted on an extruded Ni-30(at.%)Al-20Fe-0.05Zr intermetallic alloy in the temperature range 300–1200 K and the microstructures were characterized by optical, scanning and transmission electron microscopy. The alloy did not exhibit any room temperature ductility and failed by transgranular cleavage at a stress of about 710 MPa. This mode of fracture was observed at and below 873 K with the total ductility being less than 2.5%. However, the failure mode changed to dimpled fracture, triple point cracking and rupture above 873 K. Scanning electron microscopy of the fracture surfaces revealed that transgranular cleavage failure had always originated at pre-existing defects. In these cases, the fracture stress exhibited a good correlation with the defect size in accordance with linear elastic fracture mechanics, where the critical stress intensity factor was estimated to be about 4 MPa m1/2.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Groves, G. W. and Kelly, A., Phil. Mag. 8, 877 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Law, C. C. and Blackburn, M. J., Rapidly Solidified Lightweight Durable Disk Material, Final Technical Report, AFWAL-TR-87–4102.Google Scholar
3. Miracle, D. B., Russel, S. and Law, C. C., in High-Temperature Ordered Intermetallic Alloys III, edited by Liu, C. T., Taub, A. I., Stoloff, N. S. and Koch, C. C. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 133, Pittsburgh, PA 1989) p. 225.Google Scholar
4. Inoue, A., Masumoto, T. and Tomioka, H., J. Mater. Sci. 19, 3097 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Guha, S., Munroe, P. R. and Baker, I. in High-Temperature Ordered Intermetallic Alloys III, edited by Liu, C. T., Taub, A. I., Stoloff, N. S. and Koch, C. C. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 133, Pittsburgh, PA 1989) p. 633.Google Scholar
6. Guha, S., Guha, P. M. and Baker, I., Scripta Metall. 23, 897 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Huang, S. C., Field, R. D. and Krueger, D. D., Metall. Trans. 21 A, 959 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Larsen, M., Misra, A., Hartfield-Wunsch, S., Noebe, R. and Gibala, R. in Intermetallic Matrix Composites, edited by Anton, D. L., Martin, P. L., Miracle, D. B. and McMeeking, R., (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 194, Pittsburgh, PA 1990) p. 191.Google Scholar
9. Noebe, R. D., private communication.Google Scholar
10. Barrett, C. R., Oxid. Met. 30, 361 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Raj, S. V., Noebe, R. D. and Bowman, R., Scripta Metall. 23, 2049 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Sneddon, I. N., Proc. Roy. Soc. (Lond.) 187 A, 229 (1946).Google Scholar
13. Reuss, S. and Vehoff, H., Scripta Metall. 24, 1021 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar