Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:24:31.060Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mechanical Characterization of Thin Films Using Full-Field Measurement of Diaphragm Deflection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

R. I. Pratt
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720.
G. C. Johnson
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720.
Get access

Abstract

A new method for evaluating the elastic moduli and residual stresses in thin films is presented. This technique is based on measurement of the complete deflected shape of pressurized diaphragms made of the material to be evaluated. It offers important advantages over previous techniques in which only the displacement of the center of the diaphragm is measured as a function of pressure. The experimental apparatus uses a laser beam and its reflection from the sample surface to determine relative height. Measurements are made over an area of the sample by performing a two-dimensional scan of the sample under the laser beam. The most important advantage of determining the entire deformed shape of the diaphragm is that the shape is known rather than assumed. This way, the particular theory chosen to analyze the structural response does not also dictate a deformed shape based solely on the maximum deflection at the midpoint. Plate theory, as opposed to the more traditional membrane theory, is used to account for the dominance of bending behavior at low pressure and near the diaphragm edges. An energy method is employed to estimate stiffness and residual stress. The accuracy of this approximate method is directly related to how closely the assumed mode shape used in the analysis approximates the true response of the structure. Since these surface profiles are measured experimentally, the resulting property estimates are obtained with increased confidence.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Tabata, O., Kawahata, K., Sugiyama, S. and Igarashi, I., Sensors and Actuators, 20 , 135(1989).Google Scholar
2 Stewart, R.A., Kim, J., Kim, E. S., White, R. M. and Muller, R. S., Sensors and Materials, 2, 5, 285(1991).Google Scholar
3 Maier-Schneider, D., Maibach, J. and Obermeier, E., J. Micromech. Microeng. 2 , 173(1992).Google Scholar
4 Vlassak, J. J. and Nix, W. D., J. Mater. Res. 12 ,3242(Dec. 1992).Google Scholar
5 Meirovitch, L., Analytical Methods in Vibrations, Macmillan Publishing Co., New York, 1967.Google Scholar
6 Raley, N. F. and Van Duzer, T., J. Appl. Phys. 58 (1) , 280(July 1985).Google Scholar
7 Dym, C. L. and Shames, I. H., Solid Mechanics, A Variational Approach, McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, 1973.Google Scholar
8 Ugural, A. C., Stresses in Plates and Shells, McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, 1981.Google Scholar
9 Timoshenko, S. and Woinowsky-Krieger, S., Theory of Plates and Shells, McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, 1959.Google Scholar
10 Zienkiewicz, O. C., The Finite Element Method, McGraw-Hill Book Co. (UK), London, 1985.Google Scholar
11 Wolfram, S., Mathematica, A System for Doing Mathematics by Computer, Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Redwood City, California, 1988.Google Scholar
12 Brantley, W. A., J. Appl. Phys., 44 (1) , 534 (Jan. 1973).Google Scholar