Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:55:15.467Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Mechanical Behavior of Microcellular Foams

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

M. H. Ozkul ,
J. E. Mark  and
J. H. Aubert
M. H. Ozkul
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and the Polymer Research Center University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221-0172
J. E. Mark
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and the Polymer Research Center University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221-0172
J. H. Aubert
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185
Get access

Abstract

The mechanical behavior of microcellular open-cell foams prepared by a thermally induced phase separation process are investigated. The foams studied were prepared from isotactic polystyrene, polyacrylonitrile, and poly(4-methyl-1-pentene) (rigid foams), and polyurethane and Lycra (elastomeric foams). Their densities were in the range 0.04–0.27 g/cm3. Conventional polystyrene foams were used for comparison. The moduli and collapse stresses of these foams were measured in compression and compared with the current constitutive laws which relate mechanical properties to densities. A reinforcement technique based on the in-situ precipitation of silica was used to improve the mechanical properties.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 207: Symposium I – Mechanical Properties of Porous and Cellular Materials , 1990 , 15
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Aubert, J.H. and Clough, R.L., Polymer, 26 2047 (1985)Google Scholar
2. Aubert, J.H., Sylwester, A.P., and Rand, P., Polymer Preprints, 30, 447 (1989)Google Scholar
3. Gibson, L.J. and Ashby, M.F., R.Soc.Lond. A, A382, 43 (1982)Google Scholar
4. Gibson, L.J. and Ashby, M.F., Cellular Solids. Structure and Properties, (Pergammon Press, Oxford, England, 1988)Google Scholar
5. Warren, W.E. and Kraynik, A.M., J. Appl. Mech. 55, 341 (1988)Google Scholar
6. Williams, J.M., J. Mat. Sci. 23 900 (1988)Google Scholar
7. Jackson, C.L., Shaw, M.T., and Aubert, J.H. (accepted by Polymer)Google Scholar
8. Mark, J.E. and Schaefer, D.W. in Polymer Based Molecular Composites, edited by Schaefer, D. W. and Mark, J.E. (Mater.Res.Soc. Proc. 171, Pittsburg, PA 1990)Google Scholar
9. Brandrup, J. and Immergut, E.H., Polymer Handbook (3rd Ed., JohnWiley and Sons Inc, NewYork, NY 1989) p.V/82.Google Scholar
10. Lanceley, H.A., Mann, J., and Pagany, G. in Composite Materials, edited by Holliday, L. (Elsevier Pub. Comp. 1966) p.224 Google Scholar
11. The ratio of yield stress/modulus is calculated for the polystyrenes given in Modern Plastics Encyclopedia, edited by Agranoff, J., (McGraw-Hill Inc., 61, NewYork, NY 1984–1985) p.453, and an average ratio of 0.0265 is obtained; by using this ratio, and the modulus given in Ref.10, the yield stress of IPS is calulatd to be 148 MPa.Google Scholar
12.Ref.11, p.353.Google Scholar
13.The Lycra has been mentioned as a polyurethane in Phillips, W.M., Pierce, W.S., Rosenberg, G. and Donachy, J.H. in Synthetic Biomedical Polymers. Concepts and Application, edited by Szychen, M. and Robinson, W.J. (Technomic Publishing Co. Company, Inc.,Westport, CT 1980) p.41, therefore, the values given in Ref.4 for the polyurethane are also used for the Lycra.Google Scholar