Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:28:46.697Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mechanical Behavior of a Mems Acoustic Emission Sensor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

D. F. Bahr
Affiliation:
Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455
J. S. Wright
Affiliation:
Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455
L. F. Francis
Affiliation:
Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455
N. R. Moody
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA 94551
W. W. Gerberich
Affiliation:
Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455
Get access

Abstract

The elastic modulus and hardness of materials used in a MEMS acoustic emission sensor were determined using nanoindentation techniques. In addition to testing each individual material, the behavior of four candidate bottom electrode structures, two based on nitride layers and two based on oxide layers, have been evaluated. The multilayer nitride bottom electrode is relatively unaffected by a 950 °C annealing step; however, some evidence of second phase formation in the polycrystalline silicon layer has been observed. Increasing the thickness of the thermally grown silicon dioxide in the oxide based electrodes lowers the measured hardness of the top layer of platinum while increasing the measured modulus of the entire electrode at depths corresponding to the oxide film. Errors of up to 25% in the calculated area of indentation based on the indenter shape function occur for indentations which penetrate both the platinum and oxide films.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Wright, J.S. and Francis, L.F., Mater Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 433, in press (1996).Google Scholar
2. Doerner, M.F. and Nix, W.D., J. Mater. Res., 1, 601 (1986).Google Scholar
3. Oliver, W.C. and Pharr, G.M., J. Mater. Res., 7, 1564 (1992).Google Scholar
4. Page, T.F. and Hainsworth, S.V., Surf. Coat. Tech., 61, 201 (1993).Google Scholar
5. King, R.B., Int. J. Solids Struct., 23, 1657 (1987).Google Scholar
6. Pharr, G.M. and Oliver, W.C., Mater. Res. Bull., 17, No. 7, 28 (1992).Google Scholar
7. Doerner, M.F., Gardner, D.S., and Nix, W.D., J. Mater. Res., 1, 845 (1986).Google Scholar
8. Tsui, T.Y., Oliver, W.C., and Pharr, G.M., J. Mater. Res., 11, 752 (1996)Google Scholar
9. Marshall, D.B. and Evans, A.G., J. Appl. Phys., 56, 2632 (1984)Google Scholar