Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:34:04.445Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Measuring Interface State Distributions in Ultra-Thin Mos Capacitors with Direct Tunnel Current Leakage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

H. Song
Affiliation:
Microelectronics Research Center and Dept. of Physics, New Jersey Institute of Technology, University Heights, Newark, NJ 07102, [email protected], [email protected]
K. R. Farmer
Affiliation:
Microelectronics Research Center and Dept. of Physics, New Jersey Institute of Technology, University Heights, Newark, NJ 07102, [email protected], [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Using a leakage-compensated charge (LCCV) technique to obtain static capacitance-voltage (C-V) curves, we extend the standard high-low C-V method for determining the interface state level density, Dit as a function of energy in the silicon band gap to metal-oxide-silicon capacitors in the direct tunneling regime (oxide thickness ∼<3.5 nm). The LCCV technique yields true static C-V curves for oxides at least as thin as 2.8 nm, where the tunnel leakage current is so high that the usual quasistatic C-V measurement is not possible. As applications of this method, Dit is compared for fresh oxides of different tunnel thickness, and Dit is measured before and after constant voltage stress of a 3.5-nm oxide. The stress results indicate, as in other work on thicker oxides, that interface traps are created during the stress, with peak densities both below and above midgap. This approach is expected to be useful for evaluating both ultra-thin oxides and leaky alternate gate dielectrics.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Dressendorfer, P. V., Ph.D. Thesis, Yale University (1978).Google Scholar
2 Song, H., Dons, E., Sun, X. -Q. and Farmer, K. R., Proceedings of NIST 1998 International Conference on Characterization and Metrology for ULSI Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, (1998)Google Scholar
3 Nicollian, E. H. and Brews, J. R., MOS Physics and Technology, New York: Wiley, 1982.Google Scholar
4 Farmer, K. R., Andersson, M. o. and Engström, O., Appl. Phys. Lett. 60 (1992) 730.10.1063/1.106551Google Scholar
5 Lundgren, P., Andersson, M. o., Farmer, K. R. and Engström, O., Microelectronic Engineering 28 (1995) 67.10.1016/0167-9317(95)00017-3Google Scholar
6 Farmer, K. R., Debauche, C., Giordano, A, Lundgren, P., Andersson, M. O. and Buchanan, D. A., Appl. Surf Sci. 104/105 (1996) 369.10.1016/S0169-4332(96)00173-0Google Scholar
7 Xie, L., Farmer, K. R. and Buchanan, D. A., Microelectronic Engineering 36 (1997) 25.10.1016/S0167-9317(97)00009-9Google Scholar