Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:37:14.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Measurements of Residual Stresses in Low-Stress Silicon Nitride Thin Films Using Micro-Rotating Structures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Xin Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Yitshak Zohar
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Tong-Yi Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Get access

Abstract

A variety of rotating micro structures were designed, fabricated and characterized for residual-stress (or strain) measurements in low-stress silicon nitride thin films, deposited by LPCVD on silicon wafers. The sensitivities of the micro structures were calculated by finite element method (FEM) and verified experimentally. The results were further confirmed by utilizing the wafer-curvature method for stress measurements. The size of the structures enables local residual-stress (or strain) measurement. The stress level depends on both the film thickness and the gas ratio and also varies with the location on the wafer.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Fan, L. S., Tai, Y. C. and Muller, R. S., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, ED-35, p. 724 (1988).Google Scholar
2. Wenzel, S. W. and White, R. M., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, ED-35, p. 735 (1988).Google Scholar
3. Sekimoto, M., Yoshihara, H. and Ohkubo, T., J. Vac. Sci. Technol., 21, p. 1017 (1982).Google Scholar
4. Flinn, P. A., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 130, p. 41 (1989).Google Scholar
5. 0. Tabata, Kawahata, K., Sugiyama, S. and Igarashi, I., Sensors and Actuators, 20, p. 135 (1989).Google Scholar
6. Howe, R. T. and Muller, R. S., J. Appl. Phys., 54, p. 4674 (1983).Google Scholar
7. Mehregany, M., Howe, R. T. and Senturia, S. D., J. Appl. Phys., 62, p. 3579 (1987).Google Scholar
8. Tai, Y. C. and Muller, R. S., Proc. IEEE MEMS '90, p. 147 (1990).Google Scholar
9. Goosen, J. F. L., Drieenhuizen, B. P., French, P. J. and Wolffenbuttel, R. F., Tech. Digest, Transducers '93, Yokohama, Japan, June 7–10, p. 783 (1993).Google Scholar
10. Petersen, K. E., Proceedings of the IEEE, 70, p. 420 (1982).Google Scholar