Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:20:09.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

MBE Growth and Characterization of CdTe, ZnTe Epilayers and CdTe/ZnCdTe Superlattices on GaAs Substrates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

I.E. Trofimov
Affiliation:
Max-Plank Institute, Stuttgart 80, FRG
M.V. Petrov
Affiliation:
Princeton University, Physics Department, NJ 08544-0708
F.F. Balakirev
Affiliation:
P.N. Lebedev Physical Institute, Moscow 117924, Russia
V.V. Kalinin
Affiliation:
Institute of Semiconductor Physics, Novosibirsk, Russia
U.G. Sidorov
Affiliation:
P.N. Lebedev Physical Institute, Moscow 117924, Russia
Get access

Abstract

Semiconductor heterostuctures ZnxCd1−xTe/CdTe were found to be of interest recently due to their potential practical usage. The reason for this is the beautiful variety of electrical heterostucture properties which arise from the strong influence of elastic deformation distribution. Thin epilayer films and superlattices ZnxCd1−xTe/CdTe were prepared on GaAs semi-isolator substrates by MBE technology with RHEED oscillation measurements of the deposited layers. X-ray measurements have shown high crystalline quality of the samples.

We have performed Raman scattering studies of ZnxZnxCd1−xTe/CdTe structures. The data obtained were interpreted as a proff of the pseudomorphous growth model. That is, ZnxCd1−xTe/CdTe SLS keeps the lattice constant of the buffer layer.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Jackson, M., Miles, R.H., McGill, T.C. and Faurie, J.P., Appl. Phys. Lett. 55, 786 (1989).Google Scholar
2. Menendez, J., Pinczuk, A., Valladares, J.P., Feldman, R.D., Austin, R.F., Appl. Phys. Lett. 50, 1101 (1987).Google Scholar
3. Monfroy, G., Sivananthan, S., Chu, X., Faurie, J.P., Knox, R.D., Staudenmann, J.L., Appl. Phys. Lett. 49, 152 (1986).Google Scholar
4. Feldman, R.D., Austin, R.F., Dayem, A.H., Westerwick, E.H., Appl. Phys. Lett. 49, 797 (1986).Google Scholar
5. Cibert, J., Gobil, Y., Dang, Le Si, Tatarenko, S., Feuillet, G., Jouneau, P.H., Saminadayar, K., Appl. Phys. Lett. 56, 292 (1990).Google Scholar
6. Kuzmin, V.D., to be published.Google Scholar
7. Golding, T.D., Qadri, S.B. and Dinan, J.H. J.Vac.Sci.Technol. A7, 616 (1989).Google Scholar
8.According to our calculations, the progressive downward shift with decreasing CdTe width is due to the phonon confinement. It can not be caused by stress, because in this case one would expect upward shift.Google Scholar
9. Gill, B., Bunstan, D.J., Calatayud, J., Mathieu, H., Faurier, J.P., Phys. Rev. B40, 5522 (1989).Google Scholar
10. Landolt-Bornstein Tables, edited by Madelung, O., Schulz, H. and Weiss, H. (Springer, Berlin 1982), vol.3,17b.Google Scholar
11. Olego, D.J., Raccah, P.M., Faurie, J.P., Phys.Rev. B33, 3819 (1986).Google Scholar