Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:55:32.471Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Manufacturable Large Area CdS Thin Films for Solar Cell Applications Monitored with Optical Emission Spectroscopy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

L. Wang
Affiliation:
Materials Research Group, Inc., Wheat Ridge, CO 80033. (www.MatResGrp.com)
I. Eisgruber
Affiliation:
Materials Research Group, Inc., Wheat Ridge, CO 80033. (www.MatResGrp.com)
R. Hollingsworth
Affiliation:
Materials Research Group, Inc., Wheat Ridge, CO 80033. (www.MatResGrp.com)
C. DeHart
Affiliation:
Materials Research Group, Inc., Wheat Ridge, CO 80033. (www.MatResGrp.com)
T. Wangensteen
Affiliation:
Materials Research Group, Inc., Wheat Ridge, CO 80033. (www.MatResGrp.com)
R. E. Treece
Affiliation:
Materials Research Group, Inc., Wheat Ridge, CO 80033. (www.MatResGrp.com)
P. Bhat
Affiliation:
Materials Research Group, Inc., Wheat Ridge, CO 80033. (www.MatResGrp.com)
W. N. Shafarman
Affiliation:
Institute of Energy Conversion, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716-3820
Robert W. Birkmire
Affiliation:
Institute of Energy Conversion, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716-3820
T. J. Gillespie
Affiliation:
Lockheed Martin Aeronautics, Denver, CO 80201
Get access

Abstract

Manufacturable, sputtered, device-quality, CdS thin films are reported for high efficiency solar cell applications. The sputtering plasma is monitored during deposition using optical emission spectroscopy. Optical emission spectroscopy (OES) is commonly used as an end point detector in plasma etching processes, where the disappearance of the etch product wavelength signature provides an unambiguous indication of completion. OES is only now beginning to be examined for controlling deposition processes, primarily because the dependence between OES signal and film properties can frequently be a quite complex function of the electron and gas densities, the emitting species concentration, the electron impact excitation cross section, the electron energy distribution function, and the probability of inelastic collisions between plasma species. OES monitoring during CdS sputtering allows accurate determination of deposition rate. Both Cd and S emission peaks can be identified, allowing tracking of the results of preferential sputtering. The OES output has been tied directly into the chamber controls, resulting in automatic closed-loop control of deposition rate. The resulting CdS films are device-quality and well-suited to large-scale manufacturing. A photovoltaic efficiency of 12.1 % was obtained from sputtered CdS on CIGS absorber, compared to 12.9% for the traditional, but less manufacturable, chemical bath deposited CdS on the same batch of CIGS. The sputtering technique has many advantages over other deposition techniques, such as easy scaleablity to large areas, simple process control, compatibility with in-line manufacturing of layered devices and low cost. RF, or lower-cost pulsed DC, sputtering power supplies can be used with comparable deposition rates. The structure, optical, and electrical properties of the sputtered CdS thin films have been characterized.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Tuttle, J. R., Ward, J. S., Duda, A, Berens, T. A., Contreras, M. A., Ramanathan, K. R., Tennant, A. L., Keane, J., Cole, E. D., Emery, K., and Roufi, R., Mater. Res. Soc. Proc., 426, 143 (1996).10.1557/PROC-426-143Google Scholar
2 Britt, J. and Ferekides, C., J. Appl. Lett., 62, 2851 (1993).10.1063/1.109629Google Scholar
3 Bhattacharya, R., (private communication).Google Scholar
4 Akkad, F. El and Naby, M. Abdel, Solar Energy Materials, 18, 151158 (1989).10.1016/0165-1633(89)90049-XGoogle Scholar
5 Martil, I., Gonzalez-Diaz, G., Sanchez-Quesada, F. and Rodriguez-Vidal, M., Thin Solid Films, 90, 253257 (1982).10.1016/0040-6090(82)90374-1Google Scholar
6 Takeuchi, Manabu, Sakagawa, Yoshimitsu, and Nagasaka, Hideo, Thin Solid Films, 33, 8998 (1976).10.1016/0040-6090(76)90590-3Google Scholar
7 Fraser, D. B. and Melchior, H., J. Appl. Phys., 43, 3120 (1972).10.1063/1.1661670Google Scholar
8 Martil, I., Gonzalez-Diaz, G., and Sanchez-Quesada, F., J. Vac.Sci. Technol. A2, 4, 1491 (1984).10.1116/1.572389Google Scholar
9 Martil, I., Gonzalez-Diaz, G., and Sanchez-Quesada, F., Thin Solid Films, 114, 327334 (1984).10.1016/0040-6090(84)90132-9Google Scholar
10 Bennouna, A. and Ameziane, E. L., Solar Energy Materials, 22, 201214 (1991).10.1016/0165-1633(91)90018-GGoogle Scholar
11 Tsai, C. T., Chuu, D. S., Chen, G. L. and Yang, S. L., J. Appl. Phys., 79, 9105 (1996).10.1063/1.362645Google Scholar
12 Akkad, F. El, Naby, M. Abdel, Solar Energy Materials, 18, 151 (1989).10.1016/0165-1633(89)90049-XGoogle Scholar
13 Hill, R., Solid State Electron. Device, 2, 549 (1978).Google Scholar
14 Ray, S., Banerjee, R. and Barua, A. K., Japan. J. Appl. Phys. 19, 1889 (1980).10.1143/JJAP.19.1889Google Scholar