Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T02:13:29.138Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Magnetostrictive Microcantilever as Micro-Biosensor Platform

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Suiqiong Li ,
Zhimin Li ,
Lisa Orona  and
Z.-Y. Cheng
Suiqiong Li
Affiliation:
Materials Research and Education Center, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, U.S.A.
Zhimin Li
Affiliation:
Materials Research and Education Center, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, U.S.A.
Lisa Orona
Affiliation:
Materials Research and Education Center, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

In this paper, a novel micro-biosensor platform - magnetostrictive microcantilever (MSMC) - is reported. The resonance behavior and the sensitivity of MSMC as sensor platform were characterized and compared to the theoretical calculation. The detection of yeast cells using the biosensor made of MSMC was reported. The results demonstrate the feasibility of MSMC as a high performance biosensor platform. Compare to current microcantilevers, which is widely considered as the state-of-art sensor platform, the MSMCs have following advantages: 1) remote/wireless driving and sensing; 2) easy to fabricate. More importantly, it is experimentally found that the quality merit factor (Q value) of MSMC can reach more than 250, which is much higher than other cantilevers.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 855: Symposium W – Mechanically Active Materials , 2004 , W3.9
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Raiteri, R., Grattarola, M., and Berger, R., Materials Today, 5(1), 22–29, (2002)Google Scholar
2. Raiteri, Roberto, Grattarola, Massimo, Butt, Hans-jurgen, Skladal, Petr, Sensors and Actuators B, 79, 115–126, (2001)Google Scholar
3. Yamaguchi, H., Miyashita, S., and Hirayama, Y., Journal of Crystal Growth, 251, 556–559, (2003).Google Scholar
4. Zhang, X., Yang, M., Vafai, K., and Ozkan, C. S., Journal of the Association for Laboratory Automation, 8, 90–93, (2003)Google Scholar
5. Ilic, B., Czaplewski, D., Zalalutdinov, M., and Graighead, H. G., Journal of Science & Technology B, 19, 2825–2828, (2001)Google Scholar
6. Ilic, B., Craighead, H. G., Krylov, S., Senaratne, W., Ober, C. and Neuzil, P., Journal of Applied Physics, 95, 36943703, (2004)Google Scholar
7. Yi, Jeong. W., Shih, Wan. Y., Mutharasan, R., and Shih, Wei-Heng, Journal of Applied Physics, 93, 619–625, (2003)Google Scholar
8. Yum, K., Wang, Z. Y., Suryavanshi, A. P., and Yu, M. F., Journal of Applied Physics, 96, 3933–3938, (2004)Google Scholar
9. Read, D. T., Measurement Science and Technology, 9, 676–685, (1998)Google Scholar