Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:40:12.566Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Magnetostrictive Methods of Detecting Torque from Case-Hardened Steel Shafts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2011

Ichiro Sasada*
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics, Kyushu University 36, Fukuoka 812, Japan
Get access

Abstract

This paper begins with a review of the current problems associated with the application of conventional magnetic-head-type shaft torque sensors. These sensors were first proposedin 1954. Newly developed low-profile magnetic heads for torque sensors which address the problems of the older type of sensors are then presented. The torque sensor which uses the lowprofile pick-up heads is described in detail. Experimental results showing the basicperformance of the torque sensor with carburized nickel chromium molybdenum steel shafts (SNCM 420 in JIS) are then described. In this combination of the heads and the shaft, thehysteresis of the inputoutput relationship is generally small and shows that the direction of traversal around the hysteresis loop changes as the amplitude of the excitation current changes. It is shown that an optimum operating condition exists for the torque sensorin which the hysteresis achieves a minimum value yet the sensitivity remains high. In a particular combination studied in this paper, the optimum excitation current was 0.3 A at the excitation frequency 60 kHz, where the total power loss at the pick-up heads was 0.37W. Under this operating condition, the hysteresis was extremely small, and the linearity was better than 0.6%.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Beth, R. A., Meeks, W. W., Rev. Sci. Instrum. Vol. 25, 603 (1954).Google Scholar
[2]Dahle, O., ASEA Journal, Vol. 33, No. 3, 23 (1960).Google Scholar
[3]Sasada, I., Hiroike, A., Harada, K., IEEE Trans Magn Vol. 20, No. 5, 951 (1984).10.1109/TMAG.1984.1063520Google Scholar
[4]Ettleman, D., Hoberman, M., Machine Design, 1963, 134.Google Scholar
[5]Sasada, I., Tanaka, T., Baba, M., Harada, K., IEEE Trans Magn, Vol. 24, No. 6, 2886 (1988).Google Scholar
[6]Sasada, I., Baba, M., Harada, K., IEEE Trans. Magn, Vol. 25, No. 5, 3417 (1989).10.1109/20.42320Google Scholar
[7]Sasada, I., Uramoto, S., Harada, K., IEEE Trans. Magn, Vol. 22, No. 5, 406 (1986).10.1109/TMAG.1986.1064383Google Scholar
[8]Sasada, I., Koga, F., Harada, K., IEEE Trans. Magn, Vol. 29, No. 6, 3231 (1993).Google Scholar
[9]Sasada, I., Koga, F., J. Appl. Phys. Vol. 75, No. 10, 5916 (1994).10.1063/1.355511Google Scholar