Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T10:36:45.902Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Magnetoresistive Properties of Quasiperiodic Metallic Multilayers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

M. Shima
Affiliation:
Department of Materials and Nuclear Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742
L. Salamanca-Riba
Affiliation:
Department of Materials and Nuclear Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742
L. J. Swartzendruber
Affiliation:
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899
Get access

Abstract

Fibonacci Ni/Cu multilayers were fabricated by electrodeposition for the first time. The deposition of these quasiperiodic as well as periodic multilayers was fully controlled by a computer. X-ray diffraction spectra from a quasiperiodic multilayer built up from blocks of Ni(8ML)/Cu(4.5ML) and Ni(8ML)/Cu(9ML) indicate that the multilayer is of good quality. Since a Fibonacci multilayer has a quasiperiodic nature, the magnetoresistance effect in this system is expected to give more information about the mechanism for magnetic interlayer coupling in the GMR effect. The magnetic and magnetoresistive properties of the quasiperiodic multilayer were compared with those of two periodic multilayers having the equivalent layer thicknesses as the blocks composing the quasiperiodic multilayer. The magnetic and electrical properties of the quasiperiodic multilayer are not the weighted average of the two periodic multilayers.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Shinjo, T. and Tanaka, T., Editors, Metallic Superlattices Artificially Structured Materials (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1987).Google Scholar
2. Hathaway, K.B., Ultrathin Magnetic Structures II ed. by Heinrich, B. and Bland, J. A. C. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1994) p. 60.Google Scholar
3. Shechtman, D., Blech, I., Gratias, D. and Cahn, J. W., Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 1951 (1984).Google Scholar
4. Merlin, R., IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 24, 1791 (1988).Google Scholar
5. Cheng, Z., Savit, R. and Merlin, R., Phys. Rev. B 37, 4375 (1988).Google Scholar
6. Zhang, Y., “Giant Magnetoresistance of Electrochemically Produced Copper-Nickel Multilayers,” Thesis submitted to the University of Maryland, (1994).Google Scholar
7. Bennett, L.H., Swartzendruber, L. J., Lashmore, D. S., Oberie, R., Atzmony, U., Dariel, M. P. and Watson, R. E., Phys. Rev. B 40, 4633 (1989).Google Scholar
8. Bird, K. D. and Schlesinger, M., J. Electrochem. Soc. 142, L65 (1995).Google Scholar
9. Kyuno, K., Kaneko, T., Sakuda, M., Tianfu, Sun and Yamamoto, R., J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 126, 158(1993).Google Scholar
10. van Heerden, D., Zolotoyabko, E. and Shechtman, D., J. Mater. Res. 11, 2825 (1996).Google Scholar