Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:35:26.626Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Magnetic Softening and Hardening in Metglas® 2605SC at the Onset of Nanocrystallization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

S. Aburto
Affiliation:
M. Jiménez
Affiliation:
Facultad de Ciencias, National University of Mexico, México D.F., México
V. Marquina
Affiliation:
Candidate to Ph.D. at CIMAV, S.C., Chihuahua, México
R. Gómez
Affiliation:
Facultad de Ciencias, National University of Mexico, México D.F., México
M. L. Marquina
Affiliation:
Facultad de Ciencias, National University of Mexico, México D.F., México
R. Ridaura
Affiliation:
Facultad de Ciencias, National University of Mexico, México D.F., México
R. Valenzuela
Affiliation:
Instituto de Investigaciones en Materiales, National University of Mexico, México D.F, México
Get access

Abstract

Mössbauer spectroscopy, coercive field and permeability were used to study the transformations produced by annealing at 375°C as-quenched amorphous ribbons of Metglas® 2605 SC of nominal composition Fe81B13.5Si3.5C2. The coercive field showed a decrease (softening) in the 0-30 min range, followed by an increase (hardening) for annealing times above 30 min. Permeability exhibited the opposite behavior, with a maximum for about 30 min. The Mössbauer magnetic hyperfine spectra showed variations in the intensities ratios, which were related with macroscopic measurements in good agreement with the softening-hardening processes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Gonser, U. in Atomic Energy Rev., Supplement No. 1. Topical Issue: Application of nuclear Techniques to the studies of Amorfous Metal. Scientific Editor: Gonser, U., 203227 (1981).Google Scholar
2. Aburto, S. et al., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 405, 507511 (1996).Google Scholar
3. Ok, H. N. and Morrish, A. H., Phys. Rev. B 23, 22572261 (1981).Google Scholar
4. van Diepen, A. M. and den Broeder, F. J. A., J. Appl. Phys. 48, 31653166 (1976).Google Scholar
5. Oxborrow, C. A. and Mørup, S., Nucl. Instr. and Meth., 101102 (1993).Google Scholar
6. Gömez-Polo, C. et al. Phys. Rev. B 53, 31363141 (1996)Google Scholar
7. Vázquez, M. et al. Appl. Phys. Lett. 64, 31843186 (1994).Google Scholar