Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T06:53:25.313Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Magnetic Anisotropy and Growth Texture in Co35Pd65 Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

S. U. Jen
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan 11529, ROC
J. Y. Huang
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan 11529, ROC
K. B. Huang
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan 11529, ROC
Get access

Abstract

Pd-rich Co-Pd alloy films are well known to exhibit perpendicular anisotropy. In this study, Co35Pd65 films were made by the vapor deposition method. The thickness of the films ranged from 80 to 2000 Å. Following measurements were carried out on each film sample: the impurities and alloy compositions were checked by Auger depth profile analysis (AES), the surface topology was mapped out by an atomic force microscope (AFM), the structural analysis was done by using the X-ray diffractometer (XRD), and the magnetic properties, such as magnetic anisotropy and saturation magnetization, were measured by a SQUID magnetometer and/or a MOKE (using the longitudinal or polar effect) apparatus. Magnetic quantities, such as the out-of-plane (either hard or easy axis) squareness ratio Mr/Ms, saturation magnetization Ms, and anisotropy energy Ku, are closely related to the structural properties, such as the degree of (111) texture, grain size D, mode of growth (nucleation texture or growth texture), and impurities in films. The emphasis is placed on the thickness dependence of these quantities, and the interrelationship among them.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Childress, J. R., Duvail, J. L., Jasmin, S., Barthelemy, A., Fert, A., Schuhl, A., Durand, O., and Galtier, P., J. Appl. Phys. 75, 6412 (1994).Google Scholar
2. Tsunashima, S., Nagase, K., Nakamura, K., and Uchiyama, S., IEEE Trans. MAG–25, 3761 (1989).Google Scholar
3. Weiler, D., Brandie, H., and Chappert, C., J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 121, 461 (1993).Google Scholar
4. Hashimoto, S., Ochiai, Y., and Aso, K., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 28, 1596 (1989).Google Scholar
5. Fujiwara, H., Kadomatsu, H., and Tokunaga, T., J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 31–34, 809 (1983).Google Scholar
6. Jen, S. U., Wei, C. T., and Huang, J. Y., to appear in J. Magn. Magn. Mater. (1997).Google Scholar
7. Laughlin, D. E., Feng, Y. C., Lee, L. L., and Wong, B. in Polycrystalline Thin Films, edited by Barmak, K. (Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. 343, Pittsburgh, PA 1994), p. 343.Google Scholar
8. Li, D. Y. and Szpunar, J. A. in Polycrystalline Thin Films, edited by Barmak, K. (Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. 343, Pittsburgh, PA 1994), p. 137.Google Scholar
9. Revay, R., Schneir, J., Brower, D., Villarrubia, J., Fu, J., Cline, J., Hsieh, T. J., and Wong-Ng, W. in Polycrystalline Thin Films, edited by Barmak, K. (Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. 343, Pittsburgh, PA 1994), p. 119.Google Scholar
10. Siriwardane, H., James, W. J., Pringle, O. A., and Newkirk, J. W. in Magnetic Ultrathin Films, edited by Jonker, B. T. (Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. 313, Pittsburgh, PA 1993), p. 425.Google Scholar
11. Nakahara, S., Thin Solid films, 45, 421 (1977).Google Scholar
12. This datum is for fee Co25Pt75.Google Scholar