Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T08:01:30.817Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Magentic Susceptibility in Ultrathin Films of Magnetic Materials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Kamakhya P. Ghatak
Affiliation:
Department of Electronic Science, University of Calcutta, University College of Science and Technology, 92, Acharya Prafulla Chandra Road, Calcutta-700 009, INDIA.
P. K. Bose
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Jadavpur University, Calcutta-700 032, INDIA.
Gautam Majumder
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Jadavpur University, Calcutta-700 032, INDIA.
Get access

Abstract

In this paper we have studied the dia and paramagentic susceptibilities of the holes in ultrathin films of magnetic materials in the presence of a parallel magentic field on the basis of a newly derived dispersion law for such systems. The numerical computations are performed taking Hg1-xMnx Te and Cd1-xMnx Se as examples. Both the susceptibilities increses with decreasing doping and film thickness respectively. It is important to note that not only the paramagnetic-to-diamagnetic susceptibility ratio for the present case deviates from (1/3) in conventional semiconductors, but also that is a critical region, where quenching of the diamagnetic occurs. The theoretical analysis is in agreement with the experimental datas as given elsewhere.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCE

[1] Dreifus, D.L., Koblous, R.M., Harris, K.A., Bicknell, R.N., Giles, N. C. and Schetzina, J.F., Appl. Phys. Letts. 51, 931 (1987).Google Scholar
[2] Dreifus, D.L., Kolbus, R.M., Tassitino, J.R., Harper, R.L., Bickness, R.N. and Schetzina, J.F., J. Vac. Sci. Tech. 6A, 2722 (1988).Google Scholar
[3] Bicknell, R.N., Giles-Taylor, N.G., Schetzina, J.F., Anderson, N.G. and Laidig, W.D., J. Vac. Sci. Tech. 4, 212 6 (1986).Google Scholar
[4] Bicknell, R.N., Giles, N.G., Schetzina, J.F., Anderson, N.G. and Laidig, W.D., Appl. Phys. Letts. 46, 238 (1985).Google Scholar
[5] Becla, P., J. Vac. Sci. Tech. 6A, 2725 (1988).Google Scholar
[6] Bicknell, R.N., Gailes, N.G. and Schetzina, J.F., Appl. Phys. Letts. 49, 1095 (1986).Google Scholar
[7] Bicknell, R.N., Giles, N.C., Schetzina, J.F. and Hitzman, C., J. Vac. Sci. Tech. 5A, 3059 (1987).Google Scholar
[8] Harpar, R.L., Hwang, S., Giles, N.C., Bickness, R.N., Schetzina, J.F., Lee, Y.R. and Ramdas, A.K., J. Vac. Sci. Tech. 6A, 2627 (1988).Google Scholar
[9] Dreifas, D.L. and Kolbous, R.M., Appl. Phys. Letts. 53, 1279 (1988).Google Scholar
[10] Furdyna, J.K., J. Appl. Phys. 64, 29 (1988).Google Scholar
[11] Elfros, A.L. and Kakanov, B., J. Exp. Theo. Phys. 96, 218 (1994).Google Scholar