Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T03:33:25.879Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Low-Temperature Aging and Phase Stabiliy of U6Nb

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

L. M. Hsiung
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Chemistry and Materials Science Directorate, P.O. Box 808, L-352, Livermore, CA 94551–9900.
C. L. Briant
Affiliation:
Brown University, Division of Engineering, Providence, RI 02912.
K. R. Chasse
Affiliation:
Brown University, Division of Engineering, Providence, RI 02912.
Get access

Abstract

Aging behavior and phase stability of a water-quenched U-6wt%Nb (U-14at%Nb) alloy artificially aged at 200°C and naturally aged at ambient temperature for 15 years have been investigated using Vickers hardness test, X-ray diffraction analysis, and transmission electron microscopy techniques. Age hardening/softening phenomenon is observed from the artificially aged samples according to microhardness measurement. The age hardening can be rationalized by the occurrence of spinodal decomposition, or fine scale of Nb segregation, which results in the formation of a nano-scale modulated structure within the artificially aged samples. Coarsening of the modulated structure after prolonged aging leads to the age softening. The occurrence of chemical ordering (disorder-order transformation) is found in the naturally aged sample based upon the observations of antiphase domain boundaries (APB's) and superlattice diffraction patterns. A possible superlattice structure is accordingly proposed for the chemically ordered phase observed in the naturally aged alloy sample.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Vandermeer, R.A., Acta Metall., 28 (1980), p. 383.Google Scholar
2. Eckelmeyer, K.H., Romig, A.D., and Weirick, L.J., Met. Trans. A, 15A (1984), p. 1319.Google Scholar
3. Vandermeer, R.A., Ogle, J.C., and Northcutt, W.G. Jr, Met. Trans. A, 12A (1981), p. 733.Google Scholar
4. Field, R.D., Thoma, D.J., Dunn, P.S., Brown, D.W., Cady, C.M, Pil. Mag. A, 81 (2001), p. 1691.Google Scholar
5. Jackson, R.J., Miley, D. V., Trans. ASM, 61 (1968), p. 336.Google Scholar
6. Beverini, G., Edmonds, D.V., Colloque De Physique, Colloque C8, C8429.Google Scholar
7. Cahn, J.W., Trans. TMS of AIME, 242 (1968), p. 166.Google Scholar
8. Sato, K. and Stobbs, W.M., Phil. Mag. A, 69 (1994), 349.Google Scholar
9. Butler, E.P. and Thomas, G., Acta Metall., 18 (1970), 347.Google Scholar
10. Zhoa, J.C. and Notis, M.R., Acta. Mater., 46 (1998), 4203.Google Scholar
11. Edington, J.W., Practical Electron Microscopy in Materials Science, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1976.Google Scholar