Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T21:23:40.328Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Low-Energy Ar+ Implantation of Uhmw-Pe Fibers: Effect on Surface Energy, Chemistry, and Adhesion Characteristics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

R. Schalek ,
M. Hlavacek  and
D. S. Grummon
R. Schalek
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy, Mechanics and Materials Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
M. Hlavacek
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy, Mechanics and Materials Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
D. S. Grummon
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy, Mechanics and Materials Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
Get access

Abstract

Ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMW-PE) has a highly chain-extended and crystalline structure which is functionally inert and requires surface-modification before it can successfully operate as a reinforcement in polymer-matrix composites. Although plasma treatments are adequate for this purpose, recent work has shown that irradiation with low-energy inert gas ions can produce increases in interfacial shear strength (ISS), in epoxy matrices, which exceed those of commercial plasma treatments, and cause little degradation in tensile properties. Low energy ions are readily produced in high-current beams using gridded sources having moderate cost, and processing times may be a short as a few seconds. In this paper, we present results of recent experiments using argon ions accelerated to energies between 100 eV and 1 keV to irradiate 20-30 µm diameter UHMW-PE fibers to doses between 1×1016 and 1×1017 cm−2, and compare our findings with previous work at higher accelerating potentials. At the optimum dose (which increases with decreasing energy), greater than 9-fold improvements in ISS level, measured in epoxy-resin droplet pulloff tests, were found for ion irradiation at 0.25 keV. Scanning electron microscopy of fiber surfaces, of ion irradiated as well as commercial oxygen plasmatreated materials, revealed small crack-like pits in both cases, with the pits smaller and more uniformly distributed on the ion-irradiated fibers. Surface chemistry studies using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and attenuated total reflectance Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR) indicate that irradiation resulted in high surface concentrations of polar functional groups, and extensive surface oxidation. This was accompanied by a substantial increase in the polar component of surface energy, which resulted in improved fiber wetting by the resin.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 236: Symposium B – Photons and Low Energy Particles in Surface Processing , 1991 , 335
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Ozzello, A., Grummon, D. S., Drzal, L. T., Kalantar, J., Low, I-H. and Moody, R. A., MRS Proc. 153, 217–222 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Grunmmon, D.S., Schalek, R., Ozzello, A. and Drzal, L.T. in Structural Composites: Design and Processing Technology Pro. 6th Annual ASM/ESD Advanced Composites Conference, 155–162, Oct. (1990).Google Scholar
3. Grummon, D.S., Schalek, R., Ozzello, A., Kalantar, J. and Drzal, L.T., Nuc. Inst. and Meth., B59/60 1271–1275 (1991).Google Scholar
4. Cuomo, J.J., Rossnagel, S.M. and Kaufman, H.R. in Handbook of Ion Beam Processing Technologyv Principles, Deposition. Film Modification and Synthesis, Park Ridge, NJ. (1989).Google Scholar
5. Nguyen, L.T., Sung, N-H. and Suh, N.P., J. Polymer Sci.: Polym. Lett. Ed. 18, 541–548 (1980).Google Scholar
6. Kim, C. Y. and D.Goring, A.I., J. Applied Polymer Sci. 15, 1357–1361 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Gaur, U. and Davidson, T., MRS Proc. 170, 309–314 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Venkatesan, T., Calcagno, L., Elman, B.S. and Foti, G. in Ion Beam Modifications Of Insulators, Eds. Mazzoldi, P. and Arnold, G.W., Elsevier, N.Y. (1987).Google Scholar
9. Koul, S.L., Campbell, I.D., McDonald, D.C., Chadderton, L.T., Fink, D., Biersack, J.P. and Mueller, M., Nuc. Inst. Meth., B32 186–193 (1988).Google Scholar
10. Miller, B., Muri, P. and Rebenfeld, L., Compos. Sci. & Tech. 28, 17–32 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Kaeble, D.H., Dynes, P.J. and Cirlin, E.H., J. Adhesion, 6, 23–48 (1974).Google Scholar
12. Schalek, R. and Grummon, D.S. in Advanced Comnosite Materials: New Developments and Anolications. Proc. Conf., 389–395 (1991).Google Scholar
13. Nguyen, H. X., Merrill, R. G., Schriver, A. K. and Leone, E. A. in Structural Composites: Design and Processing Technologies Pro. 6th Annual ASM/ESD Advanced Composites Conference, 333–343, Oct. (1990).Google Scholar
14. Schaible, M., Hayden, H. and Tanaka, J., IEEE Trans. Electr. Insul. EI–22, 699 (1987)Google Scholar
15. Gedde, U.W. and lfwarson, M., Polym. Eng. Sci. 30, 202 (1990)Google Scholar