Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:51:04.092Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Low Energy Ion Assisted Vapor Deposition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

X. W. Zhou
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903
H. N. G. Wadley
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903
Get access

Abstract

The performance of multilayered thin film materials often depends sensitively upon the (physical) roughness and degree of (chemical) mixing at interfaces. Irradiation of a growth surface with an assisting ion beam is often used to modify surface roughness. Molecular dynamics has been used to explore the use of low energy (less than 20 eV) Xe+ and Ar+ assisted deposition of model Ni/Cu/Ni multilayers to control both physical roughness and chemical mixing. The study indicated that under normal ion incidence condition, ion energies as low as 3 eV could effectively flatten the relatively weakly bonded copper surface (and therefore the nickel on copper interface). Higher ion energies (at least 10 eV) were required to flatten the more strongly bonded nickel surface. Chemical intermixing by an exchange mechanism between a surface atom and an underlying atom in an already deposited layer depended upon the binding energy of the already deposited layer. As a result, significant chemical mixing occurred as 9 eV (and above) ions impacted with nickel atoms on an already deposited copper surface. At a given ion incident energy, (the heavier) Xe+ ions resulted in less roughness but more mixing. A modulated ion assistance strategy in which no assisting ion beam was used while depositing the first few monolayers of each new metal layer was found to successfully reduce both interfacial roughness and interlayer mixing.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Baibich, M. N., Broto, J. M., Fert, A., Dau, F. N. V., Petroff, F., Eitenne, P., Creuzet, G., Friederich, A. and Chazelas, J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2472(1988).Google Scholar
2. Binasch, G., Grunberg, P., Saurenbach, F. and Zinn, W., Phys. Rev. B39, 4828(1989).Google Scholar
3. Prinz, G. A., Science 282, 1660(1998).Google Scholar
4. Simonds, J. L., Phys. Today, April, 26(1995).Google Scholar
5. Kano, H., Kagawa, K., Suzuki, A., Okabe, A., Hayashi, K. and Aso, K., Appl. Phys. Lett. 63, 2839(1993).Google Scholar
6. Kools, J. C. S., J. Appl. Phys. 77, 2993(1995).Google Scholar
7. Zhou, X. W. and Wadley, H. N. G., J. Appl. Phys. 84, 2301(1998).Google Scholar
8. Zhou, X. W. and Wadley, H. N. G., J. Appl. Phys. 87, 553(2000).Google Scholar
9. Zhou, X. W. and Wadley, H. N. G., J. AppI. Phys., in press.Google Scholar
10. Schmeusser, S., Rupp, G. and Hubert, A., J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 166, 267(1997).Google Scholar
11. Foiles, S. M., Phys. Rev. B32, 7685(1985).Google Scholar
12. Johnson, R. E., in Energetic Charged-Particle Interactions with Atlmosheres and Surfaces, Physics and Chemistry in Space Planetology, Vol. 19, ed. Lanzerotti, L. J., Hill, M. and Stoffler, D., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, p. 68, 1990.Google Scholar
13. Zhou, X. W., Johnson, R. A. and Wadley, H. N. G., Acta Mater. 45, 1513(1997).Google Scholar