Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:38:10.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lognormal Simulation of Pore Evolution During Cement and Mortar Hardening

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Dexiang Shi ,
Weiping Ma  and
Paul W. Brown
Dexiang Shi
Affiliation:
Materials Research LaboratoryThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity Park, PA 16802
Weiping Ma
Affiliation:
Materials Research LaboratoryThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity Park, PA 16802
Paul W. Brown
Affiliation:
Materials Research LaboratoryThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity Park, PA 16802
Get access

Abstract

A model to describe the pore sizes in cement paste and mortar, as determined by high pressure mercury intrusion porosimetry, has been developed. The model describes porosity using a compound lognormal distribution. For given material under a given set of curing conditions, the weighing factors and shape parameters of two sub-distributions in the lognormal model may be considered as constants, while the location parameters may be related to curing time and the relationship can be quantified. Therefore, it is possible to predict both the pore size distribution in cement and mortar at any age as well as the evolution in pore size during curing.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 176: Symposium U – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIII , 1989 , 143
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Shi, D., Brown, P. and Kurtz, S., MRS Meeting, Boston, 1988, (in press).Google Scholar
2. Aitchison, J. and Brown, J. A. C., The Lognormal Distribution, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge (1957).Google Scholar
3. Irani, R., J. Phys. Chem., 63, 1603 (1959).Google Scholar
4. Irani, R. and Callas, A., Particles Size: Measurement. Interpretation, and Application, Wiley, New York (1963).Google Scholar
5. Diamond, S. and Dolch, W., J. Colloid and Interface Sci., 38, 234–244 (1972).Google Scholar
6. Kurtz, S., Levinson, S. and Shi, D., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., (in press).Google Scholar
7. Winslow, D., J. Mat., 5, 564–585 (1970).Google Scholar
8. Fowlkes, E., J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 74, 561–575 (1979).Google Scholar