Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T16:16:38.052Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Local Polarization, Charge Compensation, and Chemical Interactions on Ferroelectric Surfaces: a Route Toward New Nanostructures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2011

Dawn A. Bonnell
Affiliation:
Dept. Mat. Sci. Eng., University of Pennsylvania, 3231 Walnut St, Philadelphia, PA 19104
Sergei V. Kalinin
Affiliation:
Dept. Mat. Sci. Eng., University of Pennsylvania, 3231 Walnut St, Philadelphia, PA 19104
Get access

Abstract

The local potential at domains on ferroelectric surfaces results from the interplay between atomic polarization and screening charge. The presence of mobile charge affects surface domain configuration, switching behavior, and surface chemical reactions. By measuring the temperature and time dependence of surface potential and piezo response with scanning probe microscopies, thermodynamic parameters associated with charge screening are determined. This is illustrated for the case of BaTiO3 (100) in air, for which the charge compensation mechanism is surface adsorption and enthalpy and entropy of adsorption are determined. The local electrostatic fields in the vicinity of the domains have a dominant effect on chemical reactivity. Photoreduction of a large variety of metals can be localized to domains with the appropriate surface charge. It has been demonstrated that proximal probe tips can be used to switch polarization direction locally. Combining the ability to ‘write’ domains of local polarization with domain specific reactivity of metals, vapors of small molecules, and organic compounds leads to a new approach to fabricating complex nanostructures.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Fridkin, V.M., Ferroelectric Semiconductors, (Consultants Bureau, New York, 1980).Google Scholar
2. Giocondi, J.L., Rohrer, G.S., Chem. Mater. 13, 241 (2001).Google Scholar
3. Giocondi, J.L. and Rohrer, G.S., J. Phys. Chem B 105, 8275 (2001).Google Scholar
4. Lines, M.E., Glass, A.M., Principles and Applications of Ferroelectric and Related Materials, (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1977).Google Scholar
5. Ferroelectric Ceramics, Eds. Setter, N., Colla, E.L. (Birkhauser Verlag Basel, 1993).Google Scholar
6. Kalinin, S.V. and Bonnell, D.A., Phys. Rev. B 63, 125411 (2001).Google Scholar
7. Gorbachev, Dmitry L. and Peng, E., NanoEdv2Google Scholar
8. Kalinin, S.V., Johnson, C.Y., and Bonnell, D.A., J. Appl. Phys., in print (March 2002).Google Scholar
9. Smolenskii, G.A., Bokov, V.A., Isupov, V.A., Krainik, N.N, Pasynkov, R.E., and Sokolov, A.I., Ferroelectrics and Related Materials (Cordon and Breach, New York, 1984).Google Scholar
10. Devonshire, A.F., Phil. Mag. 40, 1040 (1949).Google Scholar
11. Devonshire, A.F., Phil. Mag. 42, 1065 (1951).Google Scholar
12. Kalinin, S.V. and Bonnell, D.A., J. Appl. Phys. 87, 3950 (2000).Google Scholar
13. Bonnell, D.A., Prog. Surf. Sci. 57, 187 (1998).Google Scholar
14. Noguera, C., J. Phys. C 12, R367 (2000)Google Scholar
15. Henrich, V.E. and Cox, P.A., The Surface Science of Metal Oxides (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994).Google Scholar
16. Gupta, S., Kalinin, S.V., and Bonnell, D.A., unpublishedGoogle Scholar