Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:24:36.083Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Local Measurements of Surfaces Stress

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Ray D. Twesten  and
J. Murray Gibson
Ray D. Twesten
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Department of Physics, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
J. Murray Gibson
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Department of Physics, Urbana, IL 61801, USA Also with Department of Materials Science and Engineering
Get access

Abstract

We have recently developed a method of local stress measurement that can be applied at the submicron level to measure differences in intrinsic stress at both free surfaces and buried interfaces. The method exploits the fact that transmission electron microscopy readily reveals local bulk strain fields produced by surface or interfacial stress differences. Using quantitative image analysis and simulation, we can determine the value of this stress difference. We have successfully applied this technique to the clean Si(111) surface during 7×7-1×1 phase coexistence and have determined the stress difference to be 30±5 meV/Å2.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 379: Symposium C – Strained Layer Epitaxy–Materials, Processing, and Devise Applications , 1995 , 263
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Webb, M.B., Surf. Sci. 299/300, 454 (1993).Google Scholar
2 Alerhand, O.L., Vanderbilt, D., Meade, R.D. and Joannopoulos, J.D., Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 1973 (1988).Google Scholar
3 Martinez, R.E., Augustyniak, W.M. and Golovchenko, J.A., Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 1035 (1990); K. Rao, R.E. Martinez and J.A. Golovchenko, Surf. Sci 227 323 (1992).Google Scholar
4 Schell-Sorokin, A.J. and Tromp, R.M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 64,1039 (1990).Google Scholar
5 see Cammarata, R.C., Progress in Surf. Sci. 46, 1 (1994) and references there in.Google Scholar
6 Webb, M.B., Men, F.K., Swartzentruber, B.S., Kariotis, R. and Legally, M.G. Surf. Sci. 242, 23(1991)Google Scholar
7 Twesten, R.D. and Gibson, J.M., Phys. Rev B50, 17628 (1994).Google Scholar
8 Sparnaay, M.J., Surf. Sci. Rep. 4, 101 (1993).Google Scholar
9 Hirsch, M.A., Howie, A., Nicholson, R., Pashley, D.W. and Whelan, M.J., Electron Microscopy of Thin Crystals, (Butterworth, London, 1967).Google Scholar
10 McDonald, M.L., Gibson, J.M. and Unterwald, F.C., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 60, 700 (1989).Google Scholar
11 Marshall, M.T., Tong, X. and Gibson, J.M., in Proc. 51st Annual Meeting of the Microscopy Society of America, edited by Bailey, G.W. and Reider, C.L. (San Francisco Press, San Fransico, 1993) p. 641 Google Scholar
12 Twesten, R.D. and Gibson, J.M., Ultramicroscopy 53, 223 (1994).Google Scholar
13 Zeitler, E., Ultramicroscopy 46 405 (1992).Google Scholar
14 Reimer, L, Transmission Electron Microscopy 2 ND Ed., (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1989).Google Scholar