Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:33:44.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Local Environment of Surface-Polyelectrolyte-Bound DNA Oligomers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Sangmin Jeon ,
Sung Chul Bae ,
Jiang John Zhao  and
Steve Granick
Sangmin Jeon
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and EngineeringUniversity of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
Sung Chul Bae
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and EngineeringUniversity of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
Jiang John Zhao
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and EngineeringUniversity of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
Steve Granick
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and EngineeringUniversity of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
Get access

Abstract

Two-photon time-resolved fluorescence anisotropy methods were used to study the dynamical environment when fluorescent-labelled DNA oligomers (labelled with FAM, 6-fluorescein-6-carboxamido hexanoate) formed surface complexes with quaternized polyvinylpyridine (QPVP) cationic layers on a glass surface. We compared the anisotropy decay of DNA in bulk aqueous solution, DNA adsorbed onto QPVP, and QPVP-DNA-QPVP sandwich structures. When DNA was adsorbed onto QPVP, its anisotropy decay was dramatically retarded compared to the bulk, which means it had very slow rotational motion on the surface. Motions slowed down with increasing salt concentration up to a level of 0.1 M NaCl, but mobility began to increase at still higher salt concentration owing to detachment from the surface-immobilizing QPVP layers.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 651: Symposium T – Dynamics in Small Confining Systems V , 2000 , T4.2b.1
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Lakowicz, J., Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy, 2nd ed. Kluwer Academic, 1999 Google Scholar
2. Magde, D., Elson, E. and Webb, W., Phys. Rev. Lett., 29, 705(1972).Google Scholar
3. Weissman, M., Schindler, H. and Feher, G. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 73, 2776(1976)Google Scholar
4. Icenogle, R. and Elson, E., Biopolymers, 22, 1919(1983).Google Scholar
5. Sasaki, T., Yamamoto, M. and Nishijima, Y., Macromol. 21, 610–616 (1988).Google Scholar
6. Ono, K.et al., Macromol. 27, 6482–6486 (1994).Google Scholar
7. Smith, T.et al., Coll. Polym. Sci. 276, 1032–1037 (1998).Google Scholar
8. Volkmer, A.et al., Biophys. J. 78, 1589–1598 (2000).Google Scholar
9. Horinaka, J., Ito, S. and Yamamoto, M., Macromol. 32, 2270–2274 (1999).Google Scholar
10. Pauls, S., Hedstrom, J. and Johnson, C., Chem. Phys. 237, 205–222 (1998).Google Scholar
11. Nuzzo, R., Allara, D., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 105, 4481–4484 (1983).Google Scholar
12. Meuse, L.et al., Langmuir 16, 4672–4677 (2000).Google Scholar
13. Higashi, N., Inoue, T. and Niwa, M., Chem. Commun. 1507–1508 (1997).Google Scholar
14. Higashi, N., Takahashi, M. and Niwa, M., Langmuir 111–115 (1999).Google Scholar
15. Schouten, S., Stroeve, P. and Longo, M., Langmuir 15, 8133–8139 (1999).Google Scholar
16. Sukhishvili, S., Granick, S., J. Chem. Phys. 109, 6861 (1998).Google Scholar