Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T18:45:50.073Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Light-Intensity Dependence of the Staebler-Wronski Effect in a-Si:H with Various Densities of Defects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Minoru Kumeda
Affiliation:
Division of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Graduate School of Natural Science & Technology, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa 920-8667, Japan.
Ryohei Sakai
Affiliation:
Division of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Graduate School of Natural Science & Technology, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa 920-8667, Japan.
Akiharu Morimoto
Affiliation:
Division of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Graduate School of Natural Science & Technology, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa 920-8667, Japan.
Tatsuo Shimizu
Affiliation:
NTT Microsystem Integration Labs, Atsugi 243-0198Japan.
Get access

Abstract

The light-intensity dependence of the photocreation of dangling bonds (DBs) were investigated for a-Si:H films with increasing density of defects before light soaking. Samples in which the density of neutral DBs had been increased by annealing at 400 C for 1 h exhibited a weak light-intensity dependence of the photocreated DBs compared to that for the as-deposited sample. Furthermore, the sample which had been illuminated with a light intensity of 1 W/cm2 for 1 h also showed a weak dependence. The results can be qualitatively explained by using rate equations for the densities of DBs and floating bonds (FBs) based on the FB-mediated photocreation of DBs. When both the densities of DBs and FBs before illumination increase, the light-intensity dependence of the DB density for a moderate value of the illumination time becomes weaker, qualitatively consistent with the observed results.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Shimizu, T., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 43, 3257 (2004).10.1143/JJAP.43.3257Google Scholar
2 Stutzmann, M., Jackson, W. B. and Tsai, C. C., Phys. Rev. B 32, 23 (1985).10.1103/PhysRevB.32.23Google Scholar
3 Kumeda, M., Shimada, M., Kimura, S., Morimoto, A. and Shimizu, T., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 42, L255 (2003).10.1143/JJAP.42.L255Google Scholar
4 Shimizu, T., Kidoh, H., Morimoto, A. and Kumeda, M., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 28, 586 (1989).10.1143/JJAP.28.586Google Scholar
5 Zhang, Q., Kumeda, M. and Shimizu, T., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 32, L371 (1993).10.1143/JJAP.32.L371Google Scholar
6 Shimizu, T. and Kumeda, M., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 38, L911 (1999). Some careless errors in this reference were corrected in ref. 1.10.1143/JJAP.38.L911Google Scholar
7 Shimizu, T., Shimada, M. and Kumeda, M., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 41, 2829 (2002).10.1143/JJAP.41.2829Google Scholar
8 Branz, H.M., Phys. Rev. B 59, 5498 (1991).Google Scholar