Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:20:05.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Light Emitting thin Film Devices Based on Self-assembled Multilayer Heterostructures of PPV

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

M. Ferreira ,
O. Onitsuka ,
A. C. Fou ,
B. Hsieh  and
M. F. Rubner
M. Ferreira
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA02139.
O. Onitsuka
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA02139.
A. C. Fou
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA02139.
B. Hsieh
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA02139.
M. F. Rubner
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA02139.
Get access

Abstract

PPV based light emitting thin film devices were fabricated using a layer-by-layer deposition technique involving the alternate spontaneous adsorption of a PPV precursor polymer and either poly(styrene-4-sulfonate) (SPS) or poly(methacrylic acid) (PMA). It was demonstrated that the polyanion used to self-assemble the PPV precursor strongly influences the characteristics and performance of the resulting LEDs. Devices fabricated with PPV created in the presence of SPS exhibited symmetric I–V curves, low luminance levels and very high current densities while PPV/PMA devices exhibited luminance levels in the range of 10–60 cd/m2 and classical rectifying behavior. These dramatic differences are primarily due to a low level of p-type doping activated during the thermal conversion of PPV and/or during device operation that confers excellent hole carrier transport capabilities to the PPV/SPS combination. Fabrication of a multi-slab type heterostructure device comprised of a PPV/SPS block (hole transporting block) and a PPV/PMA block (emitting block) resulted in improved performance with luminance levels significantly higher than previously obtained for a single slab PPV/PMA device (typically > 100 cd/m2). It was also demonstrated that the presence of very thin (about 20–30 Å thick) insulating layers at the Al/polymer interface improves device efficiency by a factor of 2–4.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 413: Symposium W – Electrical, Optical, and Magnetic Properties of Organic Solid State Materials III , 1995 , 49
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Tang, C. W. and VanSlyke, S. A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 51, p. 913 (1987).Google Scholar
2. Kido, J., Hongawa, K., Okuyama, K. and Nagai, K., Appl. Phys. Lett., 64, p. 815 (1994).Google Scholar
3. Burrows, P.E. and Forrest, S. R., Appl. Phys. Lett., 64, p. 2285 (1994).Google Scholar
4. Burroughes, J. H., Bradley, D. D. C., Brown, A. R., Marks, R. N., Mackay, K., Friend, R. H., Bum, P. L. and Holmes, A. B., Nature, 347, p. 539 (1990).Google Scholar
5. Braun, D. and Heeger, A. J., Appl. Phys. Lett., 58, p. 1982 (1991).Google Scholar
6. Greenham, N. C., Moratti, S. C., Bradley, D. D. C., Friend, R. H. and Holmes, A. B., Nature, 365, 628 (1993).Google Scholar
7. Ferreira, M., Rubner, M. F., and Hsieh, B. R., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 328, p. 119, (1994).Google Scholar
8. Fou, A.C., Onitsuka, O., Ferreira, M., Rubner, M. F., and Hsieh, B. R., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 369, p. 575 (1995).Google Scholar
9. Ferreira, M. and Rubner, M. F., Macromolecules, 28, p.7107, (1995).Google Scholar
10. Hsieh, B. R., Polym. Bull., 25, p. 177 (1991).Google Scholar
11. Fou, A. C., Onitsuka, O., Ferreira, M., Rubner, M. F. and Hsieh, B., J. Appl. Phys., submitted.Google Scholar
12. Parker, I. D., J. Appl. Phys., 75, p. 1656 (1994).Google Scholar
13. Pei, Q., Yu, G., Zhang, C., Yang, Y. and Heeger, A. J., Science, 269, p. 1086 (1995).Google Scholar
14. Bradley, D. D. C. and Friend, R. H., J. Phys.: Condens. Matter, 1, p. 3671, (1995).Google Scholar
15. Onitsuka, O., Fou, A. C., Ferreira, M., Rubner, M. F. and Hsieh, B. H., to be published.Google Scholar
16. Ettedgui, E., Razafitrimo, H., Park, K. T., Gao, Y. and Hsieh, B. H., Surface and Interface Analysis, 23, p. 89 (1995)Google Scholar
17. Hsieh, B. R., Ettedegui, E., Park, K. T. and Gao, Y., Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst., 256, p. 71 (1994).Google Scholar