Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:44:20.356Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Light and Scanning Electron Microscopy of Human Spinal Ligaments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

L.-H. Yahia
Affiliation:
Biomedical Engineering Institute, Ecole Polytechnique de Montréal, Canada
G. Drouin
Affiliation:
Biomedical Engineering Institute, Ecole Polytechnique de Montréal, Canada
C.-H. Rivard
Affiliation:
Ste-Justine Hospital, Montreal, Canada
Get access

Abstract

Spinal ligaments were obtained from normal and scoliotic individuals. Detailed morphological studies were carried out on the yellow, interspinous and supraspinous ligaments by light and scanning electron microscopy. Normal yellow ligaments are mostly constituted of dense elastin fibers with only a few collagen fibers and sparse blood vessels, while in normal interspinous and supraspinous ligaments, the presence of collagen is highly dominant. In the latter structures, the collagen fascicles are characterized by a regular waviness morphology. The fibrils constituting the fascicles appear either parallel or helical with respect to the fascicle axis. Structural changes are observed in the spinal ligaments of patients with congenital as well as idiopathic scoliosis. For yellow ligaments, only slight differences are found between normal and scoliotic specimens. However, alterations in collagen waviness and architecture are observed mainly in the supraspinous ligaments and to a lesser extent in the interspinous ligaments. In addition, increases in the cellularity, loose connective tissue and vessels are found in both forgoing ligaments. These results indicate that the more pronounced scoliosis-related changes occur in ligaments having the farthest distance from the axis of flexion-rotation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Uden, A., Nilson, I.M., Willner, S., Acta Orthop. Scand., 61, 271273 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Harvey, W., in Low Back Pain, Vol.2, Edited by Grahame, R. and Anderson, J.A.D. (Eden Press, Annual Research Reviews, Westmount, 1980), pp. 1822.Google Scholar
3. Panjabi, M. M., Goel, U.K., Takata, K., Spine, 7(3), 192203 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Sinclair, D.C., Feindel, W.H., Weddell, G., Falconer, M.A., J.B.J.S., 30B, 516521 (1948).Google Scholar
5. Nordwall, A., acta Orthop. Scand. Suppl. 150, 9178 (1973).Google Scholar
6. Venn, G., Metha, M.H., Mason, R.M., Biochim. Biophys. Acta,. 757, 259267 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Waters, R.L. and Morris, J.M., J. Biomech. 6, 843848 (1978).Google Scholar
8. Yahia, H., Ph.D. Thesis, Ecole Polytechnique de Montréal 1984.Google Scholar
9. Shah, J.S., Jayson, M.I.V., Hampson, W.G.J., Engng. in Med., 8(2), 95102 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Yahia, H. and Drouin, G., Adv. in Bioeng., ASME, 4445 (1984).Google Scholar
11. Heylings, D.J.A., J. Anat., 125, 127181 (1978).Google Scholar
12. Kapanji, I.A., Physiologie articulaire, trone et rachis, tome 3, 4ième édition, Maloine, S.A. (Paris, 1982).Google Scholar
13. Chazal, J.. Tanguy, A., Bourges, M., Gaurel, G., Escande, G., Guillot, M., Vanneuville, G., J. Biomech., 18(8), 167176 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar