Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:39:13.135Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Leakage Current Behavior in Common I-Layer A-SI:H P-I-N Photodiode Arrays

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Jeremy A. Theil*
Affiliation:
Semiconductor Products Group, Agilent Technologies, 5301 Stevens Creek Blvd., MS 51L-GW, Santa Clara, CA, 95051, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

Hydrogenated amorphous silicon photodiode arrays form the basis of monolithic three-dimensional integrated circuit sensor technology. In these arrays, the intrinsic a-Si:H layer covers the entire area to maximize light collection. One technique by which the pixel diode is defined, is to pattern the bottom contact layer independently of the intrinsic layer. One of the most important characteristics of any diode array, however, is that the dark-state reverse bias leakage currents must be as low as possible to minimize diode noise. This study examines the leakage currents associated with the pixelated array. These structures are unique in that the edge of the diode is defined by the local electric field between diodes, rather than the physical surface of an a-Si:H film. The effect of the diode edge has been found to induce a field-dependent component to the reverse bias leakage current. For example, diodes with 5500Å i-layer, have a junction leakage of 14 to 20 pA/cm2, at 5.0 x 104 V/cm, while the pixel edge-dependent current component can be as high as 30 pA/cm2. In addition, it will be shown that the i-layer thickness and junction doping plays a key role in determining the behavior of the leakage currents.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Theil, J. A., Snyder, R., Hula, D., Lindahl, K., Haddad, H., and Roland, J., J. Non-Cryst. Sol., 299, 1234 (2002).Google Scholar
[2] Theil, J. A., Cao, M., Kooi, G., Ray, G. W., Greene, W., Lin, J., Budrys, A. J., Yoon, U., Ma, S., and Stork, H., MRS Symp. Proc., 609, A14.3.1 (2000).Google Scholar
[3] Fischer, H., Schulte, J., Rieve, P., and Böhm, M., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 336, 867 (1994).Google Scholar
[4] Schiff, E., Street, R. A., and Weisfeld, R. L., J. Non-crystalline Solids, 198 (1996) 1155.Google Scholar
[5] Street, R.A., Appl. Phys. Lett., 57(13) 1334 (1990).Google Scholar
[6] Ilie, A., and Equer, B., Phys. Rev. B, 57 24, 15349 (1998).Google Scholar
[7] Theil, J. A., Haddad, H., Snyder, R., Zelman, M., Hula, D., and Lindahl, K., Proceedings ofthe SPIE, 4435, 206 (2001).Google Scholar
[8] Theil, J. A., IEE Proc. Circuits, Devices, andSystems, 150(4), accepted for publication (2003).Google Scholar
[9] Theil, J., Lefforge, D., Kooi, G., Cao, M.,and Ray, G., J. Non-crystallineSolids, 266, 569 (2000).Google Scholar
[10] Street, R. A., Hydrogenated Amorphous Silicon, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, pp 370372, (1991).Google Scholar
[11] Deane, S. C., Clough, F. J., Milne, W. I., and Powell, M. J., J. Appl. Phys., 73 6, 2895 (1993).Google Scholar
[12] Winer, K., Phys. Rev. B, 41(7), 12 150 (1990).Google Scholar