Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:41:45.486Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Leaching of Devitrified Glass Containing Simulated SRP Nuclear Waste

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Carol M. Jantzen  and
Dennis F. Bickford
Carol M. Jantzen
Affiliation:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, Savannah River Laboratory Aiken, South Carolina 29808
Dennis F. Bickford
Affiliation:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, Savannah River Laboratory Aiken, South Carolina 29808
Get access

Abstract

Time-temperature-transformation curves have been determined for SRL-165 and SRL-131 waste glasses for all potential waste compositions. SRL-165 glasses, which contain less alkali, exhibit less complex devitrification and higher overall durability than SRL-131 waste glasses. Devitrification was found to have less effect on the durability of waste glasses than changes in composition. Non-uniform dissolution at the glass leached layer interface is observed. However, leached layers formed after 28 days shield the crystal interfaces from further dissolution.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 44: Symposium N – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management VIII , 1984 , 135
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Zhu, B. F., Clark, D. E., Hench, L. L., and Wicks, G. G., “Leaching Behavior of Nuclear Waste Glass Heterogeneities” submitted J. Non-Crystalline Solids.Google Scholar
2. Ringwood, A. E. and Willis, P. E., Nature, 311, pp 735–737 (1984).Google Scholar
3. Jantzen, C. M., Bickford, D. F., and Karraker, D. G., Advances in Ceramics, 8, Am. Ceram. Soc. Columbus, OH, pp 30–38, 1984.Google Scholar
4. Bickford, D. F., and Jantzen, C. M., Sci. Basis for Nucl. Waste Mgt. VII, McVay, G. L. (ed), Elsevier Publ, NY, pp 557–566, 1984.Google Scholar
5. Stone, J. A., Goforth, S. T. Jr. and Smith, P. K, “Preliminary Evaluatio of Alternative Forms for Immobilization of Savannah River Plant High- Level Waste,” DP-1545, E. I. Du Pont Savannah River Laboratory, December 1979.Google Scholar
6. Jantzen, C. M. and Karraker, D. G., “Quantitative X-ray Diffraction and Magnetic Susceptibility for Devitrification Studies, in prep, Am. Ceram. Soc.Google Scholar
7. Strachan, D. M., Barnes, B. O, and Turcotte, R. P., Sci. Basis for Nucl. Waste Mgt., III, Moore, J. G. (ed), Plenum Press, New York, 347–354, 1981 Google Scholar
8. Macedo, P. B. and Barkatt, A., Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, WA, PNL-5157, 1.1-1.63,. August 1984.Google Scholar
9. Harker, A. B., Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, WA, PNL-5157, 2.1-2.37, August 1984.Google Scholar
10. Flintoff, J. F. and Harker, A. B., “Detailed Processes of Surface Layer Formation in Borosilicate Waste Glass Dissolution” this volume.Google Scholar
11. Jantzen, C. M., “Surface Layer Formation During Glass Leaching: Role of Bond Energetics and Zeta Potential” Abs. for 87th Annual Meeting of American Ceramic Society, April 1985.Google Scholar
12. Welch, J. M., Miller, R. L., and Flinn, J. E., Advances in Ceramics, 8, 611–618, 1984.Google Scholar
13. Plodinec, M. J., Jantzen, C. M., and Wicks, G. G., Advances in Ceramics, 8, 385–393, 1984.Google Scholar
14. Jantzen, C. M. and Plodinec, M. J., J. Non-Crystalline Solids, 67, 207–223, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Bibler, N. E., Glastechn. Ber. 56K, 736–742, 1983.Google Scholar