Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T04:24:21.145Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Layered Manufacturing: Challenges and Opportunities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

Khershed P. Cooper
Khershed P. Cooper*
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Technology Division, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375–5343, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

Layered Manufacturing (LM) refers to computer-aided manufacturing processes in which parts are made in sequential layers relatively quickly. Parts that are produced by LM can be formed from a wide range of materials such as photosensitive polymers, metals and ceramics in sizes from a centimeter to a few meters with sub-millimeter feature resolutions. LM has found use in diverse areas including biomedical engineering, pharmaceuticals, aerospace, defense, electronics and design engineering. The promise of LM is the capability to make customized complex-shaped functional parts without specialized tooling and without assembly. LM is still a few years away from fully realizing its promise but its potential for manufacturing remains high. A few of the fundamental challenges in materials processing confronting the community are improving the quality of the surface finish, eliminating residual stress, controlling local composition and microstructure, achieving fine feature size and dimensional tolerance and accelerating processing speed. Until these challenges are met, the applicability of LM and its commercialization will be restricted. Sustained scientific activity in LM has advanced over the past decade into many different areas of manufacturing and has enabled exploration of novel processes and development of hybrid processes. The research community of today has the opportunity to shape the future direction of science research to realize the full potential of LM.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 758: Symposium LL – Rapid Prototyping Technologies , 2002 , LL1.4
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. http://www.3dsystems.com.Google Scholar
2. Ventura, S. C. et al., “Direct Photo Shaping-A New SFF Process for Ceramic Components,” Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Rapid Prototyping, (1997), pp. 271–278.Google Scholar
3. Beluze, L., Bertsch, A. and Renaud, P., Proceedings of SPIE, 3680, (2), 808–817, (1999).Google Scholar
4. Cohen, A., Zhang, G., Tseng, F-G., Mansfeld, F., Frodis, U. and Will, P., “EFAB: Batch Production of Functional, Fully-Dense Metal Parts with Micron-Scale Features“, SFF Sym. Procs., (University of Texas-Austin, 1998), pp. 161–168.Google Scholar
5. http://www.solid-scape.com. Google Scholar
6. Merz, R., Prinz, F. B., Ramaswami, K., Terk, M. and Weiss, L. E., “Shape Deposition Manufacturing“, SFF Sym. Procs., (University of Texas-Austin, 1994), pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
7. Kietzman, J. W., Cooper, A. G., Weiss, L. E., Schultz, L., Lombardi, J. L., and Prinz, F. B., “Layered Manufacturing Material Issues for SDM of Polymers and Ceramics“, SFF Sym. Procs., (University of Texas-Austin, 1997), pp. 133–140.Google Scholar
8. Orme, M. and Huang, C., “Thermal Design Parameters Critical to the Development of Solid Freeform Fabrication of Structural Materials with Controlled Nano-Liter Droplets,” SFF Sym. Procs., (University of Texas-Austin, 1995), pp 88 – 95.Google Scholar
9. http://www.sandia.gov/media/robocast.htm. Google Scholar
10. Zhang, W., Leu, M. C., Sui, G. and Ji, Z., “An Experimental and analytical Study of Ice Part Fabrication with Rapid Freeze Prototyping“, SFF Sym. Procs., (University of Texas-Austin, 1999), pp. 591–598.Google Scholar
11. Duty, C. E., Jean, D. L., and Lackey, W. J., Cer. Eng. & Sci. Procs., 20 (4), 347–354, (1999).Google Scholar
12. Crocker, J.E., Harrison, S., Sun, L., Shaw, L.L. and Marcus, H.L., JOM, 50, (12), 21–23, (1998).Google Scholar
13. Beaman, J. J. and Deckard, C. R., “Solid Freeform fabrication and Selective Laser Sintering,” North American Manufacturing Research Conference Proceedings, (1987), pp. 636–640.Google Scholar
14. http://www.eos-gmbh.de/default.htm.Google Scholar
15. Griffith, M. L., Keicher, D. M., Atwood, C. L., Romero, J. A., Smugeresky, J. E., Harwell, L. D. and Greene, D. L., “Free Form Fabrication of Metallic Components using Laser Engineered Net Shaping,” SFF Sym. Procs., (University of Texas-Austin, 1996), p. 125.Google Scholar
16. Chavez, P., “From the Inside Out: The LENS™ Process is Fueling a Paradigm Shift in Modern Manufacturing Applications,” Technical Brief, Optomec, (2000).Google Scholar
17. Arcella, F. G. and Froes, F. H., JOM, 52, (5), 28–30, (2000).Google Scholar
18. Mazumder, J., Choi, J., Nagarathnam, K., Koch, J. and Hetzner, D., JOM, 49, (5), 55–60, (1997).Google Scholar
19. http://www.pom.net. Google Scholar
20. Sachs, E., Cima, M., Williams, A. P., Brancazio, D. and Cornie, J., J of Eng for Industry, 114, (4), 481–488, (1992).Google Scholar
21. http://www.zcorp.com. Google Scholar
22. http://www.extrudehone.com. Google Scholar
23. http://www.stratasys.com. Google Scholar
24. Danforth, S. C., Safari, A., Jafari, M. and Langrana, N., “Solid Freeform Fabrication of Functional Advanced Ceramic Components”, Naval Research Reviews, vol. L, (Office of Naval Research, Three/1998), pp. 27–38.Google Scholar
25. Vaidyanathanan, R., Walish, J., Lombardi, J. L., Kasichainula, S., Calvert, P. and Cooper, K. C., JOM, 52, (12), 34–37, (2000).Google Scholar
26. Dave, D., Matz, J. and Eagar, T. W., “Electron Beam Solid Freeform Fabrication of Metal Parts“, SFF Sym. Procs., (University of Texas-Austin, 1995), pp. 64–71.Google Scholar
27. Taminger, K. M. B., Hafley, R. A. and Dicus, D. L., “Solid Freeform Fabrication: An Enabling Technology for Future Space Missions“, 2002 International Conference on Metal Powder Deposition for Rapid Manufacturing Proceedings, (MPIF, Princeton, NJ, 2002), pp. 51–60.Google Scholar
28. http://www.cubictechnologies.com. Google Scholar
29. http://home.att.net/~castleisland. Google Scholar
30. Beuth, J. and Klingbeil, N., JOM, 53, (9), 36–39, (2001).Google Scholar
31. Hofmeister, W., Wert, M., Smugeresky, J., Philliber, J. A., Griffith, M., and Ensz, M., JOM-e, 51, (7), (1999).Google Scholar
32. Ventura, S. et al, “Progress Report on Solid Freeform Fabrication Activities at SRI International,” Presented at ONR's Wood's Hole Meeting, May 26, 2000.Google Scholar
33. Han, W., Jafari, M.A., Danforth, S. and Safari, A., “Tool Path-Based Deposition Planning in Fused Deposition Processes,” J. of Mfcg. Sci. & Eng., ASME Transactions, in press, (2002).Google Scholar
34. Allahverdi, M., Jadidian, B., Harper, B., Rangarajan, S., Jafari, M., Danforth, S.C., and Safari, A., “Development of Tube Actuators with Helical Electrodes Using Fused Deposition of Ceramics”, Proceedings of 12th IEEE International Symposium on Applications of Ferroelectrics, ISAF 2000, edited by Streiffer, S.K., Gibbons, B.J., and Tsurumi, T., (IEEE publication # 00CH37076, 2001), pp 381–384.Google Scholar
35. Cooper, K. P., Arcella, F. G. and Jones, H. N., “Metallurgical Analysis of Laser Formed Rhenium“, Rapid Prototyping of Materials, edited by marquis, F. D. S. and Bourell, D. ı., (TMS, Warrendale, PA, 2002), pp. 119–132.Google Scholar
36. Sachs, E., “Manufacturing by Solid Freeform Fabrication,” SFF Sym. Procs., (University of Texas-Austin, 2001), pp. 596–618.Google Scholar
37. Sachs, E. et al, “Production of Injection Molding Tooling with Conformal Cooling Channels using the 3DP Process,” SFF Sym. Procs., (University of Texas-Austin, 1995), pp. 448–467.Google Scholar
38. Arcella, F. G., AeroMet Corp., Eden Prairie, MN, private communication. Google Scholar
39. A Long March, The Economist, July 14, 2001, p. 63.Google Scholar
40. Anderson, R L., Lembo, J. and Rynerson, M., “Rapid Manufacturing of Metal Matrix Composite Materials using 3DP,” Presented at Symposium on Rapid Prototyping of Materials, TMS Fall Meeting, Columbus, OH, October 7–10, 2002.Google Scholar
41. Kolisch, S., “Army to Produce replacement Parts on Demand in the Field,” The AMPTIAC Quarterly, 6, (3), 3–6, (2002).Google Scholar
42. Jafari, M.A., Han, W., Mohammadi, F., Safari, A., Danforth, S.C., and Langrana, N., “A Novel System for Fused Deposition of Advanced Multiple Ceramics,” J. Rapid Prototyping (in press).Google Scholar
43. Chrisey, D. B., Pique, A., Fitz-Gerald, J., Auyeung, R. C. Y., McGill, R. A., Wu, H. D. and Duignan, M., Applied Surface Science, 154–155, 593–600, (2000).Google Scholar
44. Zimbeck, W. R., Jang, J. H., Schulze, W. and Rice, R. W., “Automated Fabrication of Ceramic Electronic Packages by Stereo-photolithography,” Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings Vol. 625, (MRS, Warrendale, PA 2000), pp. 173–178.Google Scholar
45. Li, X. and Prinz, F. B., “Embedding of Fiber Optic Sensors in Layered Manufacturing,” SFF Sym. Procs., (University of Texas-Austin, 1995), pp. 314–324.Google Scholar
46. Piner, R. D., Zhu, J., Xu, F., Hong, S. and Mirkin, C. A., Science, 283, 661–663, (1999).Google Scholar
47. Chou, S. Y., Krauss, P. R. and Renstrom, P. J., Appl. Phys. Lett., 67, 3114, (1995).Google Scholar