Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:57:59.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Lattice Strain from Holes in Heavily Doped Si:Ga

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

K. L. Kavanagh
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA. 92093
G. S. Cargill III
Affiliation:
IBM Research Division, T. J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, New York 10598
R. F. Boehme
Affiliation:
IBM Research Division, T. J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, New York 10598
J. C. P. Chang
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA. 92093
Get access

Abstract

Heavily doped Si:Ga has been prepared by liquid phase epitaxy (LPE) and by ionimplantation with rapid thermal annealing (RTA) or laser annealing (LA). Peak substitutional Ga concentrations obtained by each technique were 1.5, 2.5 and 2.9 ×1020cm-3, respectively. Substitutional fractions (>90%) were similar in the three types of samples, and the conductivity scaled with the total Ga concentration. A lattice expansion per substitutional Ga atom in Si of +0.9 ± 0. l×10-24cm3 /atom was measured by double crystal x-ray diffraction. The average nearest neighbor Si-Ga bond length measured with extended x-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) was 0.237 ± 0.004 nm, indistinguishable, to within experimental error, from the intrinsic Si-Si bond lngth, 0.235 nm. Combining these two results the lattice strain per hole in the Si valence band was calculated, +0.4 ± 0.8x10G-cm3. This result complements the lattice contraction per electron in the Si conduction band (-1.8 ± 0.4x10-24cm 3) already reported for Si:As [G. S. Cargill III, J. Angilelloand K. L. Kavanagh, Phys. Rev. Letters 61, 1748 (1988)].

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Culbertson, R. J. and Pennycook, S.J., Nucl. Inst. Meth. B 13, 490 (1986).Google Scholar
2. Becker, P. and Scheffler, M., Acta. Crystall. A40, C341 (1984)Google Scholar
3. Larson, B.C. and Barhorst, J.F., J. Appl. Phys. 51, 3181 (1980).Google Scholar
4. Pajot, B. and Stoneham, A. M., J. Phys. C, 20 5241 (1987).Google Scholar
5. Cargill, G. S. III, Angilello, J., and Kavanagh, K. L., Phys. Rev. Letts. 61, 1748 (1988).Google Scholar
6. Apple, W. H., Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Stuttgart, 1985, unpublished.Google Scholar
7. Harrison, H. B., Li, Y. H., Sai-Halasz, G. A. and Iyer, S., Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. 71, 223 (1986).Google Scholar
8. White, C. W., Wilson, S. R., Appleton, B. R., Young, F. W., J. Appl. Phys. 51,738 (1980).Google Scholar
9. Bensoussan, S., Malgrange, C. and Sauvage-Simkin, M., J. Appl. Crystallogr. 20, 222 (1987).Google Scholar
10. Hornstra, J. and Bartels, W. J., J. Cryst. Growth, 44, 513 (1978).Google Scholar
11. Pauling, L., The Nature of the Chemical Bond, Cornell University Press, 1960, page 246.Google Scholar
12. Van Vechten, J. A. and Phillips, J. C., Phys. Rev. B, 2, 2160 (1970).Google Scholar
13. Pandey, K. C., private communication.Google Scholar
14. Yokota, I., J. Phys. Soc. Japan. 19, 1487 (1964).Google Scholar
15. Shih, C. K., Spicer, W. E. and Harrison, W. A., Phys. Rev. B, 31, 1139 (1985).Google Scholar