Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T06:50:52.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Laboratory and Field Data Needs for Site-Specific Repository Modeling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

M.J. Apted
M.J. Apted*
Affiliation:
Rockwell Hanford Operations, P. O. Box 800, Richland, WA 99352
Get access

Abstract

The relative importance of material properties, geochemical processes, and environmental parameters affecting containment and release of radionuclides vary strongly as a function of time and spatial position within a nuclear waste repository located in basalt (NWRB). A simple matrix of spatial regions (Engineered-Barrier System, Disturbed-Rock Zone, Site System of the Controlled Access Zone) and time periods (Pre-emplacement, Containment, Isolation/Slow-release)can be used to identify the dominant processes that affect the containment, release, and migration of radionuclides. From this analysis, a directed and efficient program of field and laboratory studies can be conducted to obtain the data required to assess the feasibility of an NWRB and compliance with Federal regulatory criteria.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 26: Symposium D – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management VII , 1983 , 77
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Rockwell Hanford Operations, Site Characterization Report for the Basalt Waste Isolation Project, DOE/RL 82-3, Rockwell Hanford Operations for the U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C. (1982).Google Scholar
2. NRC, Disposal of High-Level Radioactive Wastes in Geologic Repositories, 10 CFR 60, Rules and Regulations, Federal Register, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 48 (120) (June 21, 1983).Google Scholar
3. Rockwell Hanford OPerations, Waste Package Conceptual Designs for a Nuclear Repository in Basalt, RHO-BW-CR-136 P/AESD-TME-3142, Rockwell Hanford Operations, Richland, WA (1982).Google Scholar
4. EPA, Environmental Protection Agency, 40 CFR Part 191, Environmental Standards for the Management and Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel, High-Level and Transuranic Radioactive Wastes, Federal Register, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington D.C., 47 (250), 58, 196 (1982).Google Scholar
5. Long, P.E., ed. and Woodward-Clyde Consultants, Repository Horizon Identification Report, RHO-BW-ST-28 P, Rockwell Hanford Operations, Richland, WA (1983).Google Scholar
6. Gephart, R.E. et al. , Geohydrologic Factors and Concepts Relevant to Siting a Nuclear Waste Repository in Columbia River Basalt, Hanford Site, Richland, WA, this volume (1983).Google Scholar
7. Lane, D.L. et al. , The Basalt/Water System: Considerations for a Nuclear Waste Repository, this volume (1983).Google Scholar
8. Grandstaff, D.E. et al. , Reactions in the System Basalt/Simulated Spent Fuel/Water, this volume (1983).Google Scholar
9. Apted, M.J. and Myers, J., Comparison of the Hydrothermal Stability of Simulated Spent Fuel and Borosilicate Glass in a Basaltic Environment, RHO-BW-ST-38 P, Rockwell Hanford Operations, Richland,WA (1982).Google Scholar
10. Jacobs, G.K. and Apted, M.J., Eh-pH Conditions for Groundwater at the Hanford Site, Washington: Implications for Radionuclide Solubility in a Nuclear Waste Repository Located in Basalt, RHO-BWI-SA-174, Rockwell Hanford Operations, Richland, WA (1981).Google Scholar
11. Bradley, D.J. et al. , Nuclear Waste Package Materials Testing Report: Basaltic and Tuffaceous Environments, PNL-4452, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, WA (1983).Google Scholar
12. Allen, C.C. et al. , Experimental Studies of Backfill Stability, this volume (1983).Google Scholar
13. Wood, M.I., Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management, 6, pp. 727–734, (1983).Google Scholar
14. Nelson, J.L. et al. , Irradiation-Corrosion Evaluation of Metals in Grande Ronde Basalt Groundwater for Nuclear Waste Package Applications, this volume (1983).Google Scholar
15. Anantatnula, R.P. et al. , Corrosion Behavior of Low Carbon Steels in Grande Ronde Basalt Groundwater in the Presence of Basalt Bentonite Backfill, this volume (1983).Google Scholar
16. Gray, W.J., Garma Radiolysis Effects on Grande Ronde Basalt Groundwater, this volume (1983).Google Scholar
17. Wood, B.J., Estimation of Waste Package Performance Requirements for a Nuclear Waste Repository in Basalt, RHO-BWI-ST-10, Rockwell Hanford Operations, Richland, WA (1980).Google Scholar
18. Apted, M.J., Overview of Hydrothermal Testing of Waste Package Barrier Materials by the Basalt Waste Isolation Project, RHO-BWI-SA-228 P, Rockwell Hanford Operations, Richland, WA (1982).Google Scholar
19. National Academy of Sciences, A Study of the Isolation System for Geologic Disposal of Radioactive Wastes, National Academy Press, Washington,D.C. (1983).Google Scholar
20. Farly, T.O. et al. , Geochemical Controls on Radionuclide Releases from a Nuclear Waste Repository in Basalt: Estimated Solubilities for Selected Elements, RHO-BW-ST-39 P, Rockwell Hanford Operations, Richland, WA (1982).Google Scholar
21. Coles, D.G. and Apted, M.J., The Behavior of 99Tc in Doped-Glass/Basalt Hydrothermal Interaction Tests, this volume (1983).Google Scholar
22. Salter, P.F. et al. , Sorption Behavior of Selected Key Radionuclides in Columbia River Basalts, RHO-BWI-LD-48, Rockwell Hanford Operations, Richland, WA (1981).Google Scholar
23. Salter, P.F. and Jacobs, G.K., Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management, 5, 801–810, (1982).Google Scholar