Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:26:17.240Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Kinetics of the Adsorption of Radionuclides on Tuff From Yucca Mountain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

R. S. Rundberg*
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545
Get access

Abstract

The sorption of simple cations in tuff is dominated by adsorption on aluminosilicates that have charged surfaces, suc as zeolites and clays. The most significant sorbing minerals present in Nevada tuff are clinoptilolite, heulandite, mordenite, and montmorillonite. The kinetics of sorption on tuffs containing the minerals clinoptilolite and montmorillonite has been determined by studying the uptake of strontium, cesium, and barium on thin tuff wafers. The rate constants for uptake of these elements on tuff are consistent with a model of sorption that is diffusion limited but where diffusion occurs in two stages. First the cations diffuse into the rock through the water-filled pore space. Next, the cations must diffuse into the much narrower channels within the aluminosilicate crystals. After they are within the zeolite framework o between the clay planes, the cations may rapidly sorb on the negatively charged surfaces. The actinide elements have a time constant for the apparent sorption that is inconsistent with this model and may have a radically different mechanism o removal from solution.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Rundberg, R. S., Thompson, J. L., and Maestas, S., “Radionuclide Migration: Laboratory Experiments with Isolated Fractures,” in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management, Topp, S. V., Ed. (Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc., New York, 1982), Vol. 6, pp. 239248.Google Scholar
2. Waters, A. C. and Carroll, P. R., Eds., “Preliminary Stratigraphic and Petrologic Characterization of Core Samples from USW-GI, Yucca Mountain, Nevada,” Los Alamos National Laboratory report LA-8840-MS (November 1981).Google Scholar
3. Spengler, R. W., Byers, F. M. Jr., and Warner, J. B., “Stratigraphy and Structure of Volcanic Rocks in USW-GI, Yucca Mountain, Nye County, Nevada,” US Geol. Survey Open-File Report 811349 (1981).10.3133/ofr811349Google Scholar
4. Wolfsberg, K., Aguilar, R. D., Bayhurst, B. P., Daniels, W. R., DeVilliers, S. J., Erdal, B. R., Lawrence, F. O., Maestas, S., Mitchell, A. J., Oliver, P. Q., Raybold, N. A., Rundberg, R. S., Thompson, J. L., and Vine, E. N., “Sorption-Desorption Studies on Tuff. III. A Continuation of Studies with Samples from Jackass Flats and Yucca Mountain, Nevada,” Los Alamos National Laboratory report LA-8747-MS (May 1981).Google Scholar
5. Crank, J., The Mathematics of Diffusion, 2nd ed. (Oxford University Press, London, 1975), p. 135.Google Scholar
6. Daniels, W. R., Wolfsberg, K., Rundberg, R. S., Ogard, A. E., Kerrisk, J. F., Duffy, C. J. et al. , “Summary Report on the Geochemistry of Yucca Mountain and Environs,” Los Alamos National Laboratory report LA-9328-MS (December 1982).Google Scholar
7. Sherwood, T. K., Pigford, R. L., and Wilke, C. R., “Mass Transfer,” (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1975), p. 580.Google Scholar
8. Vermeulen, T., Klein, G., and Hiester, N. K., “Chemical Engineers' Handbook,” Perry, J. H. (Ed.) (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1973), Sec. 16.Google Scholar
9. Vaniman, D. T., Los Alamos National Laboratory, personal communication, October 1983.Google Scholar
10. Breck, D. W., Zeolite Molecular Sieves (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1974).Google Scholar
11. Barrer, R. M., Bartholomew, R., and Rees, L. V. C., J. Phys. Chem. Solids 24, 5162 (1963).Google Scholar
12. Rao, A. V. and Rees, L. V. C., Trans. Faraday Soc. 62, 2505 (1966).10.1039/tf9666202505Google Scholar