Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:33:06.894Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kinetic Monte Carlo Simulation of Dynamic Phenomena in thin Film Growth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

M. A. Gallivan ,
R. M. Murray  and
D. G. Goodwin
M. A. Gallivan
Affiliation:
Division of Engineering and Applied Science, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, [email protected]
R. M. Murray
Affiliation:
Division of Engineering and Applied Science, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, [email protected]
D. G. Goodwin
Affiliation:
Division of Engineering and Applied Science, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

In this paper we describe the response of a Kinetic Monte Carlo model to time-varying growth conditions. We vary temperature and partial pressure sinusoidally and identify behavior typical of low-dimensional nonlinear systems. In particular, the frequency content of the roughness response is sensitive to the presence of steps in the surface.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 616: Symposium I – New Methods, Mechanisms & Models of Vapor Deposition , 2000 , 61
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Fichthorn, K. A. and Weinberg, W. H.. Theoretical foundations of dynamical Monte Carlo simulations. Journal of Chemical Physics, 95(2):1090–1096, 1991.10.1063/1.461138Google Scholar
2 Nayfeh, A. H. and Balachandran, B.. Applied Nonlinear Dynamics: Analytical, Computational, and Experimental Methods, page 261. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1995.10.1002/9783527617548Google Scholar
3 Nayfeh, A. H. and Mook, D. T.. Nonlinear Oscillations, page 11. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1979.Google Scholar
4 Rosenfeld, G., Lipkin, N. N., Wulfhekel, W., Kliewer, J., Morgenstern, K., Poelsema, B., and Comsa, G.. New concepts for controlled homoepitaxy. Applied Physics A, 61:455–466, 1995.10.1007/BF01540247Google Scholar
5 Schinzer, S., Sokolowski, M., Biehl, M., and Kinzel, W.. Unconventional MBE strategies from computer simulations for optimized growth conditions. Physical Review B, 60(4):2893–2899, July 1999.10.1103/PhysRevB.60.2893Google Scholar