Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T04:42:50.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kinematic and Topological Models of Martensitic Interfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Robert C. Pond ,
Xiao Ma ,
Yaw W. Chai  and
John P. Hirth
Robert C. Pond
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering, University of Liverpool, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool, L69 3BX, U.K.
Xiao Ma
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering, University of Liverpool, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool, L69 3BX, U.K.
Yaw W. Chai
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering, University of Liverpool, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool, L69 3BX, U.K.
John P. Hirth
Affiliation:
114 E. Ramsey Canyon Road, Hereford, AZ 85615, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

The Phenomenological Theory of Martensite Crystallography, developed fifty years ago, envisages martensitic interfaces to be invariant planes of the shape transformation. This theory has been very successful, but neither incorporates the notion of atomic relaxations at martensitic interfaces, nor explicitly demonstrates that such interfaces are glissile. A new model, called the Topological Model, is proposed that addresses these issues. Predictions of the habit plane and relative orientation of the crystals according to the two models are compared and contrasted.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 855: Symposium W – Mechanically Active Materials , 2004 , W5.3
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Christian, J. W.. The theory of transformations in metals and alloys, (Pergamon, 2002).Google Scholar
2. Wechsler, M.S., Lieberman, D.S., Read, T.A.. Trans AIME, 197, p.1503–1515 (1953).Google Scholar
3. Bowles, JS, Mackenzie, JK, Acta Metall., 2, pp. 129–137, pp. 138–147, pp. 224–234 (1954), 5, pp. 137–149 (1957).Google Scholar
4. Pond, R.C., Celotto, S. and Hirth, J.P., J. Phys. IV France, 112, pp. 111–114 (2003).Google Scholar
5. Pond, R.C., Celotto, S. and Hirth, J.P.. Acta Met., 51, p. 5385–5398 (2003).Google Scholar
6. Dahmen, U.. Scripta Metall. 21, pp. 1029 (1987).Google Scholar
7. Mahon, G.J., Howe, J.M. and Mahajan, S.. Phil. Mag. A, 59, p273–279 (1989).Google Scholar
8. Chen, I-Wei and Chiao, Y.H., Acta Metall., 33, p.1827–1845 (1985).Google Scholar
9. Kajiwara, S.. J. Phys. IV France, 112, pp.61–83 (2003).Google Scholar
10. Pond, R.C. and Celotto, S.. International Materials Review, 48, pp.225–245 (2003).Google Scholar
11. Hirth, J.P. and Pond, R.C., Acta Mater., 44, pp.4749–4763 (1996).Google Scholar
12. Pond, R.C., Dislocation Model of Martensitic Transformations, Dislocations in Solids, ed. Nabarro, F.R.N. and Hirth, J.P. (Elsevier, 2005) in press.Google Scholar
13. Pond, R.C., Shang, P., Cheng, T.T. and Aindow, M., Acta Mater., 48, pp.1047–53 (2000).Google Scholar