Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T19:24:12.699Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ion Exchange in High-Level Nuclear Waste Encapsulation: Atomistic Modeling of Equilibrium Coefficients and Isotherms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

T. Kletskova ,
K. Czerwinski ,
E. Gelbard  and
S. Yip
T. Kletskova
Affiliation:
Department of Nuclear Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Av., Cambridge, MA 02139
K. Czerwinski
Affiliation:
Department of Nuclear Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Av., Cambridge, MA 02139
E. Gelbard
Affiliation:
Reactor Analysis Division, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 S. Cass Avenue, Argonne, IL 60439
S. Yip
Affiliation:
Department of Nuclear Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Av., Cambridge, MA 02139
Get access

Abstract

A computational modeling approach, based on molecular dynamics and related atomistic simulation techniques, is formulated to analyze the confinement of radionuclides in prepared nuclear wasteform for long-term disposal. While the intent is to exploit the ability of simulation to provide a unified treatment of chemical as well as kinetic processes at the molecular level, it is recognized that the problem is too complex to be studied in its entirety at the outset. To demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the atomistic modeling approach, a first step is to determine an equilibrium isotherm for cation exchange, on the premise that a predominant release mechanism is likely to involve ion exchange. As a prototypical application, Cs-Na exchange on sodalite is studied using explicit interatomic potential models. Initial results for the equilibrium Cs concentration in dehydrated sodalite suggest that the effects of frame relaxation need to be taken into account. The present study will be extended to treat an aqueous environment for the loaded wasteform, as well as the effects of radiation damage to the zeolitic framework.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 556: Symposium QQ – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXII , 1999 , 1285
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Weber, W. J. et al., DOE Workshop on Radiation Effects in Glasses Used for Immobilization of High-Level Waste And Plutonium Disposition, J. Mater. Res. 12, 1946 (1997).Google Scholar
2. Workshop Proceedings on Modeling of Industrial Materials: Connecting Atomistic and Continuum Scales, Yip, S., ed, in Journal of Computer-Aided Materials Design, vol.3 (1996).Google Scholar
3. A set of reviews on “Modelling and Simulation of Solids”, Kaxiras, E. and Yip, S.. eds, in Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science, vol.3, No.6 (1998).Google Scholar
4. Bourcier, W.L., Review of Glass Performance Modeling, ANL-94/17, July 1994.Google Scholar
5. Proceeding of Symposium J, Multiscale Modeling of Materials, MRS Symposium Proceeding Series, Bulatov, V., Rubia, T. Diaz de la, Ghoniem, N., Kaxiras, E., Phillips, R., eds. 538 (1999) in press.Google Scholar
6. A Special Issue on “ASCI Materials Modeling” J. Computer-Aided Mater. Design, 5, No.2 and 3 (1999).Google Scholar
7. Simpson, L. J. and Wronkiewicz, D. J., in Mater. Res. Soc. Sypm Proc., 465, 441 (1997).Google Scholar
8. Amphlett, C.B. “Inorganic Ion Exchangers” Elsevier Publishing Co. Amsterdam, 1964, pp.Google Scholar
9. Blake, N.P., Weakliem, P.C., and Metiu, H., J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 102, 67, (1998).Google Scholar
10. Higgins, F.M., Graemeand, W.W., Parker, S.C., J. Phys. Chem B. 101, 9964 (1997).Google Scholar
11. Parrinello, M. and Rahman, A., J. Appl. Phys. 52, 7182 (1981).Google Scholar
12. Anderson, J., Ullo, J., Yip, S., Chem. Phys. Lett. 152, 447 (1988).Google Scholar
13. Frenkel, D. and Smit, B., Understanding Molecular Simulation – From Algorithms to Applications (Academic Press, San Diego, 1996).Google Scholar
14. Snurr, R. Q., Bell, A. T., Theodorou, D. N., J. Phys. Chem. 98, 11948 (1994).Google Scholar
15. Nastar, M., Bulatov, V. V., Yip, S., Phys. Rev. B53, 13521 (1996).Google Scholar
16. Baker, J., J. Comp. Chem 7, 385 (1986).Google Scholar
17. Bell, S. and Crighton, J. S., J. Chem. Phys. 80, 2464 (1986).Google Scholar
18. Averback, R. S. and Rubia, T. Diaz de la, Solid State Phys. 51, 281 (1998).Google Scholar