Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T10:38:10.400Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ion Beam Self Annealing in Thin Silicon Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

J. D. Rubio ,
R. P. Vijay ,
R. R. Hart  and
J. D. Pearce
J. D. Rubio
Affiliation:
Dept. of Nuclear Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, texas 77843
R. P. Vijay
Affiliation:
Dept. of Nuclear Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, texas 77843
R. R. Hart
Affiliation:
Dept. of Nuclear Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, texas 77843
J. D. Pearce
Affiliation:
E.I. duPont de Nemours and Company, Atomic Energy Division, Savannah Reiver Laboratory, Aiken, South Carolina 29801
Get access

Abstract

Residual lattice disorder in lμm-thick silicon films as a function of the dose rate of 120 keV Ar+ ion implantations has been investigated. At a fluence of l×1 014 ions/cm2, low dose rates produced a highly damaged surface layer as expected; however, at a dose rate sufficient to locally heat the implanted film to a temperature of approximately 700°K, essentially complete annealing of the lattice disorder was observed. This temperature is significantly less than that normally required for post-implant thermal annealing. Measurements of lattice disorder were based on medium energy Rutherford backscattering and channeling analyses.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 128: Symposium A – Processing and Characterization of Materials Using Ion Beams , 1988 , 575
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Holmen, G. and Hogberg, P., Radiat. Eff. 12, 77 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Holmen, G., Peterstrom, S., Buren, A. and Bogh, E., Radiat. Eff. 24, 45 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Roosendaal, H.E., Kool, W.H. and Saris, F.W., Radiat. Eff. 36 35 (1978).Google Scholar
4. Cembali, G., Finetti, M., Merli, P.G. and Zignani, F., Appl. Phys. Lett. 40, 62 (1982).10.1063/1.92925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Holland, O.W. and Narayan, J., Nucl. Instr. Meth. B7/8, 243 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Cannavo, S., Ferla, A. La, Rimini, E., Ferla, G. and Gandolfi, L., J. Appl. Phys. 59, 4038 (1986).Google Scholar
7. Komarov, F.F., Kotov, E.V., Novikov, A.P., Petrov, S.A. and Chit'ko, V.I., Radiat. Eff. 105, 79 (1987).Google Scholar
8. Berti, M., Drigo, A.V., Gabilli, E., Lotti, R., Lulli, G., Merli, P.G. and Antisari, M., Nucl. Instr. Meth. B19/20, 475 (1987);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Galloni, R., Rizzoli, R., Larsen, A. and Shiryaev, S., Nucl. Instr. Meth. B19/20, 466 (1987).Google Scholar
10. Golecki, I., Chapman, G.E., Lau, S.S., Tsaur, B.Y. and Mayer, J.W., Phys. Lett. 71A, 267 (1979).Google Scholar
11. Linnros, J., Svensson, B. and Holmen, G., Phys. Rev. B30, 3629 (1984).Google Scholar
12. Williams, J.S., Elliman, R.G., Brown, W.L. and Seidel, T.E., Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 1482 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Meek, R.L., Gibson, W.M. and Braun, R.H., Nucl. Instr. Meth. 24, 435 (1971).Google Scholar
14. Lee, S.R. and Hart, R.R., Nucl. Instr. Meth. B28 470 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Touloukian, Y.S. and Ho, C.Y., Thermophysical Properties of Selected Aerospace Materials Part I, (Purdue University, Indiana, 1976), p.553.Google Scholar