Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:50:54.771Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

In-Vivo Screening of Platelet-Biomaterial Interactions in a Baboon Model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Anson A. Yeager
Affiliation:
Dept of Surgery, New England Medical Center, 750 Washington St., Boston, MA 02111
H. Hussein
Affiliation:
Dept of Surgery, New England Medical Center, 750 Washington St., Boston, MA 02111
N. Shoenfeld
Affiliation:
Dept of Surgery, New England Medical Center, 750 Washington St., Boston, MA 02111
K. Ramberg
Affiliation:
Dept of Radiology, New England Medical Center, 750 Washington St, Boston, MA 02111
R. Connolly
Affiliation:
Dept of Surgery, New England Medical Center, 750 Washington St., Boston, MA 02111
A. D. Callow
Affiliation:
Dept of Surgery, New England Medical Center, 750 Washington St., Boston, MA 02111
Get access

Abstract

A percutaneous in-vig venous model was characterized by testing platelet deposition on standard vascular prosthetic materials in the baboon. The model detected significant difference in platelet deposition on ePTFE compared to Dacron. Low molecular weight dextran was administered following a baseline test period. A significant decrease in platelet depositionr occurred for both materials and coincided with a prolongation in bleeding time. No consistent decrease was found in control experiments which used no bolus or a saline bolus for treatment. Advantages of the model included ease of use and adaptability to test large numbers of materials. The model was suItable for in-vivo screening of platelet interactions with biomaterials placed in the bloodstream.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Hanson, S.R., Harker, L., in Blood Compatibllity, Voume 1. edited by Williams, D. F. (CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, Fla. 1987) pp 3785.Google Scholar
2. Mackey, W.C., E.M., Keough, R.J., Connolly, J.L., McCollough,Ramberg-Laskaris, K., O'Donnell, T.F., Foxall, T., Callow, A.D.. J. Surg. Res. 7, 112 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Hobson, R.W., O'Donnell, J.A., Jamil, Z.,Mehta, K.. Arch. Surg. 115 833 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Fuster, V., Chesbro, J.H.. Mayo Clin. Proc. 56 102 (1981).Google Scholar
5. Larsson, R., Olsson, P., Lindahl, V.. Thromb. Res. 12 43 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Connolly, R.J., Eldrup-Jorgensen, J., Shepard, A.D., Ramberg, K., Mackey, W.C., Keough, E.M., McCullough, J.L., Callow, A.D.. In Surgicl Research: Recent Developments, edited by Hall, C.W. (Pergamon Press, New York, 1985).Google Scholar
7. Connolly, R.J., presented at 1987 MRS Fall Meeting, Boston MA, (in press).Google Scholar
8. Gellin, L.E., Sovell, L., Zederfeldt, B.. Acta Chir. Scand. 122 309 (1961).Google Scholar
9. Rutherford, R.B., Jones, D.N., Bergentz, S.E., et al. J.Vasc.Surg. 1 765 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar