Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T06:55:52.203Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Investigation of the Influence of Grain Size, Texture and Orientation on the Mechanical behavior of Freestanding Polycrystalline Gold Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Liwei Wang
Affiliation:
[email protected], Auburn University, Mechanical Engineering, 275 Wilmore Laboratory, Auburn, AL, 36849-5341, United States
Bart Prorok
Affiliation:
[email protected], Auburn University, Mechanical Engineering, 275 Wilmore Laboratory, Auburn, AL, 36849-5341, United States
Get access

Abstract

Polycrystalline gold thin films with thickness of 250nm, 500nm and 1000nm were deposited on Si substrates by means of both E-Beam evaporation and sputtering techniques. High-resolution SEM, including electron-backscattered diffraction (EBSD), was employed to provide a crystallographic analysis including grain orientation maps of the studied films. The Membrane Deflection Experiment (MDE) was employed to perform the microscale tensile testing. The Young's modulus of gold films deposited by E-Beam evaporation was measured consistently in the range of 55-62 GPa while it increased to 68-72 GPa for sputtered films. Plastic yielding of the e-beam and sputtered films was contrasted due to varying microstructure of each deposition technique, which appears to assert a measure of control on the deformation mechanics.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Stolken, J.S. and Evans, A.G., Acta Mater., 46, 5109 (1998).Google Scholar
2. Neugebauer, C.A., Newkirk, J.B. and Vermilyea, D.A., Structure and Properties of Thin Films, (John Wiley and Sons, 1959).Google Scholar
3. Nix, W.D., Met. Trans. A, 20, 2217 (1989).Google Scholar
4. Oliver, W.C. and Pharr, G.M., J. Mater. Res., 7, 1564 (1992).Google Scholar
5. Prorok, B.C., Zhu, Y., Espinosa, H.D., Guo, Z., Bazant, Z., Zhao, Y. and Yakobson, B.I., “Micro and Nanomechanics,” Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, ed. Nalwa, H. (American Scientific Publishers, 2004) 555.Google Scholar
6. Espinosa, H.D. and Prorok, B.C., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 688 (2001).Google Scholar
7. Prorok, B.C. and Espinosa, H.D., J. Nanosci. Nanotech., 2, 427 (2002).Google Scholar
8. Espinosa, H.D., Prorok, B.C. and Fischer, M., J. Mech. Phys. Sol., 51, 47 (2003).Google Scholar
9. Espinosa, H.D., Prorok, B.C. and Peng, B., J. Mech. Phys. Sol., 52, 667 (2004).Google Scholar
10. Thompson, C.V., Ann. Rev. Mater. Sci., 30, 159 (2000).Google Scholar
11. Courtney, T.H., Mechanical Behavior of Materials, (McGraw-Hill, 2000).Google Scholar
12. Ashby, M.F., Phil. Mag., 21, 399 (1970).Google Scholar
13. Emery, R.D. and Povirk, G.L., Acta Mater., 51, 2067 (2003).Google Scholar
14. Lo, C.C., Augis, J.A. and P.M.R., , J. Appl. Phys., 50, 6887 (1979).Google Scholar