Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T16:29:16.086Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Investigating the surface changes of silicon in vitro within physiological environments for neurological application

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2014

Maysam Nezafati ,
Stephen E. Saddow  and
Christopher L. Frewin
Maysam Nezafati
Affiliation:
University of South Florida, Department of Electrical Engineering 4202 E Fowler Ave, Tampa, FL 33620, U.S.A.
Stephen E. Saddow
Affiliation:
University of South Florida, Department of Electrical Engineering 4202 E Fowler Ave, Tampa, FL 33620, U.S.A.
Christopher L. Frewin
Affiliation:
University of South Florida, Department of Electrical Engineering 4202 E Fowler Ave, Tampa, FL 33620, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

Silicon has been used as one of the primary substrates for micro-machined intra-cortical neural implants (INI). The presence of various ions in the extracellular environment combined with cellular biological activity establishes a harsh, corrosive environment in the brain for INI, and as such, a long-term implant’s construction materials must be able to resist these environments. We have examined if environmental components could contribute to changes in the material, which in turn may be a contributing factor to the decreased long-term reliability in INI optimal neural recordings, which have prevented clinical use these devices for the last 4 decades. We tested silicon in artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF), Dulbecco's modified eagle medium (DMEM), and H4 cells cultured within DMEM for 96 hours at 37°C as three various physiological environments to investigate the material degradation. We have observed that Si samples immersed in only DMEM and ACSF showed very minor surface alterations. However, Si samples cultured with H4 cells exhibited a large change in surface roughness from 0.24±0.04 nm to 4.85 nm. The scanning electron microscope (SEM) micrographs showed the presence of pyramid shaped pits. Further characterization with atomic force microscope (AFM) verified this result and quantified the severe changes in the surface roughness of these samples. At this initial stage of the investigation, we are endeavoring to identify the cause of these changes to the Si surface, but based on our observations, we believe that the increased corrosion could be result of chemical products released into the surrounding environment by the cells.

Keywords

biomaterialSicorrosion
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1621: Symposium H/C/D/J – Advances in Structures, Properties and Applications of Biological and Bioinspired Materials , 2014 , pp. 237 - 242
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Frewin, C. L., Locke, C., Saddow, S. E., and Weeber, E. J., “Single-crystal cubic silicon carbide: An in vivo biocompatible semiconductor for brain machine interface devices,” in Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society,EMBC, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE, 2011, pp. 2957–2960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frewin, C. L., Jaroszeski, M., Weeber, E., Muffly, K. E., Kumar, A., Peters, M., Oliveros, A., and Saddow, S. E., “Atomic force microscopy analysis of central nervous system cell morphology on silicon carbide and diamond substrates,” Journal of Molecular Recognition, vol. 22, pp. 380–388, 2009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coletti, C., Jaroszeski, M. J., Pallaoro, A., Hoff, A. M., Iannotta, S., and Saddow, S. E., “Biocompatibility and wettability of crystalline SiC and Si surfaces,” in Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2007. EMBS 2007. 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE, 2007, pp. 5849–5852.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodwin, J. L., Kehrli, M. E. Jr, and Uemura, E., “Integrin Mac-1 and β-amyloid in microglial release of nitric oxide,” Brain Research, vol. 768, pp. 279–286, 9/12/ 1997.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pocock, J. M. and Liddle, A. C., “Microglial signalling cascades in neurodegenerative disease,” in Progress in Brain Research. vol. Volume 132, Castellano Lopez, M. N.-S. B., Ed., ed: Elsevier, 2001, pp. 555–565.Google Scholar
Wink, D. A., “The chemical mechanisms in regulatory, cytotoxic, and cytoprotective roles of nitric oxide.,” Abstracts of Papers of the American Chemical Society, vol. 215, pp. U360–U360, Apr 2 1998.Google Scholar
Wink, D. A. and Mitchell, J. B., “Chemical biology of nitric oxide: Insights into regulatory, cytotoxic, and cytoprotective mechanisms of nitric oxide,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 25, pp. 434–456, Sep 1998.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
I. O. f. Standardization, “ISO 10993–15:2000,” in Biological evaluation of medical devices – Part 15: Identification and quantification of degradation products from metals and alloys, ed, 2000.Google Scholar
I. O. f. Standardization, “ISO 10993–14:2001,” in Biological evaluation of medical devices – Part 14: Identification and quantification of degradation products from ceramics, ed. Switzerland: ISO copyright office, 2001.Google Scholar
Iler, R. K., The chemistry of silica. Solubility, polymerization, colloid and surface properties, and biochemistry. New York/Chichester/Brisbane/Toronto: John Wiley & Sons, 1979.Google Scholar
Brown, D. M., Kinloch, I. A., Bangert, U., Windle, A. H., Walter, D. M., Walker, G. S., Scotchford, C. A., Donaldson, K., and Stone, V., “An in vitro study of the potential of carbon nanotubes and nanofibres to induce inflammatory mediators and frustrated phagocytosis,” Carbon, vol. 45, pp. 1743–1756, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, B. and Robbins, H., “Chemical Etching of Silicon,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, , vol. 123, pp. 1903–1909, 1961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar