Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T17:52:04.679Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Investigating Islet Immunoisolation Parameters Using Microfabricated Membranes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

T.A. Desai ,
D.J. Hansford ,
W.H. Chu ,
T. Huen  and
M. Ferrari
T.A. Desai
Affiliation:
Joint Bioengineering Graduate Group, University of California, Berkeley and San Francisco Biomedical Microdevices Center, University of California, Berkeley, 94720
D.J. Hansford
Affiliation:
Biomedical Microdevices Center, University of California, Berkeley, 94720
W.H. Chu
Affiliation:
Biomedical Microdevices Center, University of California, Berkeley, 94720
T. Huen
Affiliation:
Biomedical Microdevices Center, University of California, Berkeley, 94720
M. Ferrari
Affiliation:
Joint Bioengineering Graduate Group, University of California, Berkeley and San Francisco Biomedical Microdevices Center, University of California, Berkeley, 94720
Get access

Abstract

The immunoisolation of xenogeneic hormone-secreting cells is a promising therapy for a wide variety of diseases including diabetes, Parkinson's, and hemophilia. By utilizing microfabrication technology, silicon biocapsules can be fabricated with membranes having precisely controlled and uniform pore sizes, allowing one to optimize parameters specifically for the encapsulation of specific hormone-secreting cell types. This study investigates immunoisolation parameters using microfabricated silicon-based membranes, with uniform membrane pore sizes in the tens of nanometer range. The permeability of IgG was studied in microfabricated biocapsules with various pore sized membranes. In addition, immunoisolative characteristics were monitored by assessing viability and functionality of islets within biocapsules.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 530: Symposium CC – Biomaterials Regulating Cell Function & Tissue Development , 1998 , 7
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Lim, F. and Sun, A.M.. “Microencapsulated Islets as Bioartificial Endocrine Pancreas,” Science, vol. 210, 1980, pp. 908–910.Google Scholar
2 Lanza, R.P. and Chick, W., “Encapsulated Cell Therapy,” Scientific American Science & Medicine, vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 16–25, 1995.Google Scholar
3 Weber, C.J., Reemstma, K.. Microencapsulation in small animals - Xenografts. In: Lanza, R.P.; Chick, W.L., eds. Pancreatic Islet transplantation: vol. III Immunoisolation of pancreatic islets. New York: RG Landes Co., pp. 59–79, 1994.Google Scholar
4 Iwata, H. et al. “Feasibility of agarose microbeads with xenogeneic islets as a bioartificial pancreas,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, vol. 28, pp. 1003–1011, 1994.Google Scholar
5 Zhang, P.C. et al. “Observing Interactions Between the IgG Antigen and Anti-IgG Antibody with AFM,” IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology, March/April 1997.Google Scholar
6 Colton, C. K.. “Implantable hybrid artificial organs,” Cell Transplantation, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 415–436, 1995.Google Scholar
7 , Colton and Avgoustiniatos, E.. “Bioengineering in Development of the Hybrid Artificial Pancreas,” Transactions of the ASME, vol. 113, pp. 152–170, 1991.Google Scholar
8 Ferrari, M. et al. “Silicon nanotechnology for biofiltration and immunoisolated cell xenografts,” Thin Films and Surfaces for Bioactivity and Biomedical Application, Cotell, C.M, Meyer, A.E., Gorbatkin, S.M., and Grobe, G.L., (eds.), MRS, vol. 414, pp. 101–106, 1996.Google Scholar
9 Chu, W. and Ferrari, M., “Silicon nanofilter with absolute pore size and high mechanical strength,” Microrobotics and Micromechanical Systems, SPIE Proc., vol. 2593, 1995.Google Scholar
10 Desai, T.A. et al. “Microfabricated Biocapsules for Cell Xenografts: A Review,” Micro and Nanofabricated Electro-Optical-Mechanical Systems for Biomedical and Environmental Application Ed. Gourley, P.L., SPIE, vol. 2978, May 1997, pp. 216–226.Google Scholar
11 Desai, T.A. et al. “Microfabricated Immunoisolating Biocapsules,” Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Vol. 57, pp. 118–120, 1998.Google Scholar
12 Burczak, K. et al. “Protein permeation through poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogel membranes,” Biomaterials, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 231–238, 1994.Google Scholar
13 Dionne, K.E. et al. . “Transport characterization of membranes for immunoisolation,” Biomaterials, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 257–266, 1996.Google Scholar
14 , Hellerstrom et al. “Method for large scale isolation of pancreatic islets by tissue culture of fetal rat pancreas,” Diabetes, vol. 28, pp. 766–769, 1979.Google Scholar
15 Iwata, H. et al. “Does Immunoisolation Need to Prevent the Passage of Antibodies and Complement?” Transplantation Proceedings, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 3224–3226, December 1995.Google Scholar