Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T14:27:19.793Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction of Role Playing to a Research Ethics Module for the Undergraduate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Dolores C. Miller ,
Frances A. Houle ,
Janet Stemwedel ,
Joseph Pesek  and
Charles Wade
Dolores C. Miller
Affiliation:
[email protected], IBM Almaden Research Center, San Jose, California, United States
Frances A. Houle
Affiliation:
[email protected], formerly IBM Almaden Research Center, San Jose, California, United States
Janet Stemwedel
Affiliation:
[email protected], San Jose State University, Philosophy, San Jose, California, United States
Joseph Pesek
Affiliation:
[email protected], San Jose State University, Chemistry, San Jose, California, United States
Charles Wade
Affiliation:
[email protected], IBM Almaden Research Center, K19 S&T, 650 Harry Road, San Jose, California, 95120, United States, 408 927-150, 408927-3310
Get access

Abstract

As part of the NSF supported SUMMIT (San Jose State University/IBM Almaden Research Center collaboration) REU and CPIMA (Stanford University/Almaden) SURE undergraduate internship programs we have developed a workshop that emphasizes the scientific community's dependence on ethical behavior for its success and advancement at this nascent stage of a scientific career. We have successfully introduced open-ended role playing based on recent real life ethics cases as reported in the scientific news to a foundation presentation based on the APS Ethics and Professional Conduct Guidelines for Physicists. The goal is to foster discussion of complex cases and their effects not only on the protagonists but on the scientific community.

Keywords

educationartgovernment policy and funding
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1233: Symposium PP – Materials Education , 2009 , 1233-PP09-06
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Hollander, Rachelle, editor; Arenberg, Carol R., co-editor, Education, Ethics and Scientific and Engineering Research: What's Been Learned? What Should Be Done? Summary of a Workshop, (The National Academies Press, Washington D.C. 2009), for example.Google Scholar
2Research Experiences for Undergraduates Supplements and Sites NSF Program Solicitation 04-584 (2004).Google Scholar
3APS Guidelines for Professional Conduct, (Adopted on November 10, 2002) http://www.aps.org/policy/statements/04_1.cfm Google Scholar
4National Science and Technology Council, Federal Policy on Research Misconduct, http://www.ostp.gov/cs/federal_policy_on_research_misconduct.Google Scholar
5 http://beta.onlineethics.org/Resources/Cases.aspx.Google Scholar
6 Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine, On Being a Scientist: a Guide to Responsible Conduct in Research, (The National Academies Press, Washington D.C. 2009)Google Scholar
7 Hayden, E. C., Nature News 453, 275–278 (2008).Google Scholar
8 Schulz, W. G., C&E News 85 (12) 35–38 (2007).Google Scholar
9 Goodstein, D., Physics World 15 Nov. 2002, 17.Google Scholar