Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:12:30.258Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Interphase in Fibre Reinforced Polymers; New Ideas on How This Controls the Composite Strength

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Michael R. Piggott
Michael R. Piggott*
Affiliation:
Advanced Composites Physics & Chemistry Group, Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Toronto, Ontario Canada M5S 1A4
Get access

Abstract

Much work has recently been done on the interphases between fibres and polymers and it is now clear that they are usually brittle. This requires a re-examination of our basic ideas on how composites achieve their strength. The Kelly-Tyson approach, which is based on ductile metal behaviour, has never received unequivocal support. In addition, work during the last ten years in the author's laboratories indicates that it is incorrect in one of its major predictions: that the stress-strain plots of short aligned fibre composites should be curves. In this paper we present the evidence and introduce a new failure model which eliminates these difficulties.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 305: Symposium I – High-Performance Polymers and Polymer Matrix Composites , 1993 , 95
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Piggott, M.R., Comp. Sci. Tech. 42, 59–78, (1991)Google Scholar
2. Netravali, A.N., Henstenburg, R.B., Phoenix, S.L. and Schwartz, P., Polym Comp. 10, 226, (1987).Google Scholar
3. Wang, Z.-N. and Piggott, M.R., Proc. Amer. Soc. Comp. (Technomic, Westport, PA 1991), 725–31.Google Scholar
4. Kelly, A., Strong Solids, (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, Second Edition., 1973), 185 Google Scholar
5. Tyson, W.R., Ph.D. Thesis, University of Cambridge, 1964.Google Scholar
6. Sutton, W.H., Rosen, B.W., and Flom, D.G., SPE J., 10, 2203∝9, (1964).Google Scholar
7. Bowyer, W.H. and Bader, M.G., J. Mat. Sci. 7, 1315–21, (1972).Google Scholar
8. Curtis, P.J., Bader, M.G. and Bailey, J.E., J. Mater Sci., 13, 377–90, (1978).Google Scholar
9. Dingle, L.E., Carbon Fibres. Their Place in Modern Technology, (Plastics Inst., London, 1974), 78–84.Google Scholar
10. Sanadi, A. and Piggott, M.R., J. Mat. Sci. 20, 421–30, (1985).Google Scholar
11 Chuang, H.Y., and Piggott, M.R., Proc. Amer Soc. Comp. (Technomic Westport, PA, 1990), 984–91.Google Scholar
12. Ko, M., Chuang, H.Y., and Piggott, M.R., Proc. Conf. on Microphenomena in Advanced Composites, Herzlia, Israel, June 30 - July 2, 1992. (To appear in Comp. Sci. Tech, 1993)Google Scholar
13. Piggott, M.R., and Dai, S.R., Polym. Eng. Sci., 31. 1246–9, (1991).Google Scholar
14. Harris, B., Dorey, S.E. and Cooke, R.G., Comp. Sci. Tech. 31, 121–41, (1988).Google Scholar
15. Piggott, M.R., submitted to J. Comp. Mater. (1993).Google Scholar
16. Jacques, D. and Favre, J.P., Proc. ICCM VI-ECCM 2, (Elsevier, London, 1987), 5, 471–80Google Scholar
17. Piggott, M.R., Load Bearing Fibre Composites. (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1980), 100.Google Scholar