Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:47:47.053Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interfacial Aspects of Reinforcement of Wood by Mineral Fibers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2011

R.V. Subramanian
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164–2920
J.M. Park
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164–2920
Get access

Abstract

Significant aspects of fiber reinforcement of wood are introduced. The effectiveness of three different silane coupling agents; one monomeric 3-aminopropyltrimethoxy silane, two polymeric aminosilanes (one dimethoxy- and another trimethoxy substituted), was compared by measurement of interfacial shear strength in silane treated single filament composite (SFC) specimens, under dry and wet conditions. The trimethoxypolymeric silane was found to be inferior to the other two, which warrant further investigation in strength tests with basalt fiber reinforced wood specimens. Acoustic emission measurement during the SFC tests has provided evidence for the sizing effect of polymeric silane coatings, as well as for moisture attack at severe surface flaws on the fiber during silane treatment.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Rowlands, R.E., Deweghe, R.P. Van, Laufenberg, T.L., and Kruger, G.P., Wood and Fiber Sci., 18, 39 (1986).Google Scholar
2. Boehme, C., Holz Roh-Werkst, 34, 155 (1986).Google Scholar
3. Boehme, C. and Schulz, V., Holz Roh-Werkst, 32, 250, (1974).Google Scholar
4. Bulleit, W.M., WSU Report 12–136, Forest Prod. Lab, Madison, WI, (1980).Google Scholar
5. Saucier, J.R. and Holman, J.A., Forest Prod. J. 25 (9), 69 (1976).Google Scholar
6. Spaun, F.D., Forest Prod. J. 31(4), 26 (1981).Google Scholar
7. Theakston, F.H., Canadian Agric. Engr., p. 17 (1965).Google Scholar
8. Laufenberg, T.L., Rowlands, R.E., and Krueger, G.P., Forest Prod. J. 34(4), 15 (1984).Google Scholar
9. Hunter, S., Brooks, W., presented at the 22nd International Particleboard/Composite Materials Symposium, Pullman, WA 1988 (unpublished).Google Scholar
10. Subramanian, R.V., Wang, T.J., and Austin, H.F., SAMPE Quarterly, 8, (4), 1 (1977).Google Scholar
11. Subramanian, R.V. and Shu, K.H., in Molecular Characterization of Composite Interfaces, edited by Ishida, H. and Kumar, G. (Plenum Publishing Corp., 1985).Google Scholar
12. Subramanian, R.V. and Crasto, A.S., Polym. Composites, 7, 201, (1986).Google Scholar
13. Crasto, A.S., Own, S.H. and Subramanian, R.V., Polym. Composites, 9, 78 (1988).Google Scholar
14. Subramanian, R.V., Austin, H.F. and Wang, T.J.Y., Final Report NR-3017, Pacific Northwest Regional Commission (1976).Google Scholar
15. Subramanian, R.V. and Austin, H.F., US Patent 4,149,866, 1979.Google Scholar
16. Subramanian, R.V. and Austin, H.F., International J. Adhesiona nd Adhesives, 1, 50 (1980).Google Scholar
17. Subramanian, R.V., in Handbook of Reinforcements for Plastics, edited by Milewski, J. and Katz, H. (Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1987), 287.Google Scholar
18. Pleuddemann, E.P., Silane Coupling Agents, (Plenum, New York, NY, 1982).Google Scholar
19. Arkles, B., Steinmetz, J. and Hogan, J., SPI Reinf. Plast/Composites Ann. Tech. Conf. 42, 21–c (1987).Google Scholar
20. Arkles, B., Steinmetz, J., and Hogan, J., Modern Plastics, p. 138, (May 1987).Google Scholar
21. Kelly, A., Proc. R. Soc. London, A319, 95 (1970).Google Scholar
22. Subramanian, R.V., Casto, A.S. and Own, S.H., in Composite Interfaces, edited by Ishida, H., Koenig, J. (Academic Press, New York, NY, 1986), p. 113.Google Scholar
23. Own, S.H., A Statistical Theory of Interfacial Shear Strength Distribution, PhD Dissertation, Washington State University, 1984.Google Scholar
24. Chaudhuri, M.K., Gentle, T.M. and Plueddemann, E.P., SPI Reinf. Plast/Composites Ann. Tech. Conf. 42, 21–B (1987).Google Scholar
25. Netravali, A.N., Henstenburg, R.B., Phoenix, S.L. and Schwartz, P., Polym. Composites 10, 226 (1989).Google Scholar