Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:40:40.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interfacial Adhesion of Cu to Self-Assembled Monolayers on SiO2

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

G. Cui ,
M. Lane ,
K. Vijayamohanan  and
G. Ramanath
G. Cui
Affiliation:
Material Science & Engineering Department, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Troy, NY 12180, U.S.A.
M. Lane
Affiliation:
Materials Science & Interconnect Reliability Division, T.J. Watson Research Center, IBM, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598, U.S.A.
K. Vijayamohanan
Affiliation:
Material Science & Engineering Department, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Troy, NY 12180, U.S.A.
G. Ramanath
Affiliation:
Material Science & Engineering Department, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Troy, NY 12180, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

As the critical feature size in microelectronic devices continues to decrease below 100 nm, new barrier materials of > 5 nm thickness are required. Recently we have shown that self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) are attractive candidates that inhibit Cu diffusion into SiO2. For SAMs to be used as barriers in real applications, however, they must also promote adhesion at the Cu/dielectric interfaces. Here, we report preliminary quantitative measurements of interfacial adhesion energy and chemical binding energy of Cu/SiO2 interfaces treated with nitrogen-terminated SAMs. Amine-containing SAMs show a ~10% higher adhesion energy with Cu, while interfaces with Cu-pyridine bonds actually show degraded adhesion, when compared with that of the reference Cu/SiN interface. However, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements show that Cu-pyridine and Cu-amine interactions have a factor-of-four higher binding energy than that of Cu-N bonds at Cu/SiN interfaces. The lack of correlation between adhesion and chemical binding energies is most likely due to incomplete coverage of SAMs.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 695: Symposium L – Thin Films: Stresses and Mechanical Properties IX , 2001 , L7.7.1
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Murarka, S. P. and Peckerar, M. C., Electronic Materials. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1989.Google Scholar
[2] Nguyen, C. V., Carter, K. R., Hawker, C. J., Hedrick, J. L., Jaffe, R. L., Miller, R. D., Remenar, J. F., Rhee, H. W., Rice, P. M., Toney, M. F., Trollasas, M., and Yoon, D. Y., Chem. Mater, 11, 3080 (1999).Google Scholar
[3] Sze, S. M., VLSI technology, vol. 566. New York: McGraw-Hill Book company, 1983.Google Scholar
[4] Lane, M., Ph. D. Thesis, “Adhesion and debonding in microelctronic devices,” in Materials Science & Engineering: Stanford, 1999, pp. 150.Google Scholar
[5] Seto, J., Asai, N., Fujiwara, I., Ishibashi, T., Kamei, T., and Tamura, S., Thin Solid Films, 273, 97 (1996).Google Scholar
[6] Ulman, A., Introduction to Ultrathin Organic Films: From Langmuir-Blodgett to Self-assembly. San Diego: Academic press, 1991.Google Scholar
[7] Haller, I., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 100, 8050 (1978).Google Scholar
[8] Schwartz, P., Schreiber, F., Eisenberger, P., and Scoles, G., Surf. Sci., 423, 208 (1999).Google Scholar
[9] Dressick, W. J., Dulcey, C. S., Georger, J. H., Calabrese, G. S., and Calvert, J. M., J. Electrochem. Soc., 141, 210 (1994).Google Scholar
[10] Krishnamoorthy, A., Chanda, K., Murarka, S.P., Ramanath, G. and Ryan, J.G., App. Phys. Lett., 78, 2467 (2001).Google Scholar
[11] Ma, Q., Fujimoto, H., Flinn, P., Jain, V., Adibi-rizi, F., Moghadam, F., and Dauskardt, R. H., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp., 391, 91 (1995).Google Scholar
[12] Dauskardt, R. H., Lane, M., Ma, Q., and Krishna, N., Eng. Fract. Mech., 61, 141 (1998).Google Scholar