Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:43:52.949Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interconnect Failure Mechanism Maps for Different Metallization Materials and Processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

V. K. Andleigh
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science & Engineering, M.I.T., Cambridge MA 02139
Y. J. Park
Affiliation:
Currently at Korean Institute of Science & Technology
C. V. Thompson
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science & Engineering, M.I.T., Cambridge MA 02139
Get access

Abstract

A tool for simulation of electromigration and electromigration-induced damage, MIT/EmSim, has been used to investigate interconnect reliability, focusing on transitions in failure mechanisms associated with void nucleation, growth, and growth saturation. Conventional scaling of electromigration test results assume that the median time to electromigration-induced failure scales with the current density j to the power −n. The effects of transitions in failure mechanisms have been studied by characterizing the apparent current density exponent. When failure is limited by void nucleation, n=2 scaling is observed, and when failure requires substantial void growth, n=1 scaling is observed. When lines end at diffusion barriers such as W or liner-filled vias, void growth saturates in short lines at low current densities, and, depending on the failure criterion, lines under these conditions can be ‘immortal’. As growth saturates, apparent current density exponents increase above 2. Failure mechanism maps can be constructed to illustrate the failure mechanisms and scaling behavior as a function of line length and current density. Failure maps can be used in accurately scaling test results to service conditions, to suggest layout strategies for optimized circuit reliability, and to assess the reliability of new interconnect materials and structures.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Bohr, M.T.. Solid State Technology, 39, p. 106. (1996)Google Scholar
2 Thompson, C.V. and Lloyd, Jr.. MRS Bulletin., 18, 19. (1993)Google Scholar
3 Blech, I.A.. J Appl. Phys., 47, p. 1203. (1976)Google Scholar
4 Filippi, R.G., Wachnik, R.A., Aochi, H., J Lloyd, R.. and Korhonen, M.A.. Appl. Phys. Lett., 69, 2350. (1996)Google Scholar
5 Korhonen, M.A., P. Børgesen, Brown, D.D.. and Li, C.-Y.. J Appl. Phys., 74, 4995. (1993)Google Scholar
6 Suo, Z.. Acta mater., 46, 3725. (1998)Google Scholar
7 Black, Jr.. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices., ED–16, 338. (1969)Google Scholar
8 Kircheim, R. and Kaeber, U.. J. Appl. Phys., 70, 172. (1991)Google Scholar
9 Oates, A.S.. Appl. Phys. Lett., 66, 1475. (1995)Google Scholar
10 Lloyd, Jr. and Clement, J.J.. Appl.Phys. Lett., 69, 2486. (1996)Google Scholar
11 Park, Y. J., Andleigh, V.K.. and Thompson, C.V.. J. Appl. Phys., 85, 3546. (1999)Google Scholar
12 Korhonen, M.A., P. Børgesen, Tu, K.N.. and Li, C.-Y.. J. Appl. Phys., 73, 3790. (1993)Google Scholar
13 Park, Y.J. and Thompson, C.V.. J. Appl. Phys., 82, 4277. (1997)Google Scholar
14 Clement, J.J. and Sriram, T.S., Digital Equipment Corporation, personal communication.Google Scholar
15 Hu, C.-K. and Harper, J.M.E., Mat. Chem. and Phys., 52, 5. (1998)Google Scholar
16 Andleigh, V.K., Srikar, V.T.. and Thompson, C.V.. To be published.Google Scholar