Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:22:56.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Intercalated Polymer Nanocomposites Prepared in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Manuel Garcia-Leiner
Affiliation:
Polymer Science and Engineering Department, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003, U.S.A.
Alan J. Lesser
Affiliation:
Polymer Science and Engineering Department, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

An alternative route to prepare polymer-clay nanocomposites using supercritical carbon dioxide (scCO2) is described. The presence of clay nanoparticles significantly influences the morphology, foaming process and crystallization of a polymer when processed in scCO2. Intercalated structures are successfully produced in the presence of scCO2 even when favorable interactions between the polymer and the clay are not present. The effect of scCO2 on the intercalation process is analyzed for a variety of polymer systems both with modified and unmodified clays. By controlling the hydrophilicity of the polymer and clay systems, specific understanding of the effect of scCO2 on the structure and morphology of the nanocomposites is obtained. Experimental results show significant increases in the clays d-spacings for scCO2-treated samples. This behavior is consistent regardless of the nature of the polymer, showing significant amounts of intercalation even in purely hydrophobic polymers.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Brennecke, J.F. Nature, 389, 333334, (1997).Google Scholar
2. Blanchard, L.A.; Hancu, D.; Beckman, E.J.; Brennecke, J.F. Nature, 399, 2829, (1999).Google Scholar
3. Sarbu, T.; Styranec, T.; Beckman, E.J. Nature, 405, 165168, (2000).Google Scholar
4. Garcia-Leiner, M.; Lesser, A.J. J. Polym. Sci: Part B: Polym. Phys.,, 42, 12, 13751383, (2003).Google Scholar
5. Garcia-Leiner, M.; Lesser, A.J. SPE Annual Technical Conference (ANTEC), San Francisco, CA, (2002).Google Scholar
6. Zerda, A.S.; Lesser, A.J. J. Polym. Sci: Part B: Polym. Phys., 39, 11, 11371146, (2001).Google Scholar
7. Lagaly, G.; Apply Clay Sci, 15, 19, (1999).Google Scholar
8. Giannelis, E.P.; Messersmith, P.B. Chem. Mater., 6, 17191725, (1994).Google Scholar
9. Pinnavaia, T.J.; Lan, T. Chem. Mater., 6, 22162219, (1994).Google Scholar
10. Pinnavaia, T.J.; Wang, Z. Chem. Mater., 10, 3769, (1998).Google Scholar
11. Bucknall, C. B.; Karpodinis, A.; Zhang, X. C. J. Mater. Sci., 29, 33773383, (1994).Google Scholar
12. Garcia-Leiner, M.; Lesser, A.J. 225th ACS National Meeting PMSE Proceedings, New Orleans, LA, (2003).Google Scholar
13. Breitenkamp, K., Simeone, J., Emrick T, Jin E., Macromolecules, 35, 92499252, (2002).Google Scholar