Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:26:46.846Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interaction of Phosphorus With Dislocation Cores in Silicon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2011

Malcolm I. Heggie
Affiliation:
Physics Department, Exeter University, EX4 4QL, UK.
Bob Jones
Affiliation:
Physics Department, Exeter University, EX4 4QL, UK.
Andrey Umerski
Affiliation:
Physics Department, Exeter University, EX4 4QL, UK.
Get access

Abstract

Silicon is an ideal model for strong covalent solids because it is an elemental semiconductor amenable to many well-defined structural, mechanical and electronic experiments. It was shown some 25 years ago that electronically active dopants enhance dislocation mobility in silicon, but recently Sumino and co-workers have shown that phosphorus also strongly pins dislocations at low stresses. Almost paradoxically the same dislocations move with enhanced mobility once they are in motion at higher stresses.

We have performed local density functional pseudopotential calculations on a molecular fragment taken from the core of a 90° partial dislocation of silicon. The surface dangling bonds were hydrogenated and phosphorus was substituted for silicon in various positions. Our results suggest that there is a strong valence effect in operation that causes phosphorus to bind very strongly to three fold coordinated sites in the core, simultaneously losing electrical activity. It is this binding that inhibits dislocation motion, because motion would require the coordination of phosphorus to change from three-fold to the more energetic fourfold.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Shockley, W., Phys. Rev. 91 228 (1953)Google Scholar
2. Gomez, A., Cockayne, D. J. H., Hirsch, P. B. and Vitek, V., Phil. Mag. 31 105 (1975)Google Scholar
3. Bourret, A., Desseaux, J. and Anterroches, C. d', Inst. Phys. Cont. Ser. No. 60 9 (1981)Google Scholar
4. Anstis, G. R., Hirsch, P. B., Humphreys, C. J., Hutchison, J. L. and Ourmazd, A., Inst. Phys. Cont. Ser. No. 60, 15 (1981)Google Scholar
5. Jones, R., J. de Physique, 40–C6 33 (1979)Google Scholar
6. Marklund, S., J. de Physique, 44–C4 25 (1983)Google Scholar
7. Heggie, M. I. and Jones, R., Inst. Phys. Cont. Ser. No. 87 367 (1987)Google Scholar
8. Lodge, K. W., Lapicerella, A., Battistoni, C., Tomassini, N. and Altmann, S. L., Phil. Mag. A 60 643 (1989)Google Scholar
9. Jones, R., Phil. Mag. A 42 213 (1989)Google Scholar
10. Heggie, M. I. and Jones, R., Phil. Mag. B 48 365 (1983)Google Scholar
11. George, A., Escaravage, C., Champier, G. and Schröter, W., Phys. Stat.Sol (a), 53 483 (1972)Google Scholar
12. Patel, J. R., Testardi, L. R. and Freeland, P. E., Phys. Rev. B 13 3548 (1976)Google Scholar
13. Hirsch, P. B., J. de Physique 40–C6 117 (1979)Google Scholar
14. Heggie, M.I., Jones, R. and Umerski, A., Phil. Mag. A to be published.Google Scholar